Automated detection of errors in location data in agricultural operations

ABSTRACT

In an embodiment, a server computer receives, over a digital communication network, agricultural data records comprising a plurality of planting and harvesting data values. Each of the planting and harvesting data values include geo-location coordinates and corresponding timestamps. The server generates a plurality of planting datasets by aggregating planting data values based on geo-location coordinates and timestamps. The server generates a plurality of harvesting datasets by aggregating harvesting data values based on geo-location coordinates and timestamps. The server determines a dataset of planting-to-harvesting matching pairs based upon nearest proximities between geo-location coordinates of planting datasets and geo-location coordinates of harvesting datasets. The server determines geo-location error values representing offsets of between geo-locations of corresponding planting-to-harvesting matching pairs. The server presents the geo-location error values on a display screen of a client computer.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS, BENEFIT CLAIM

This application claims the benefit of provisional application62/783,872, filed Dec. 21, 2018, the entire contents of which is herebyincorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein, under 35 U.S.C.§ 119(e).

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains materialwhich is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentor the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and TrademarkOffice patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright orrights whatsoever. © 2015-2019 The Climate Corporation.

FIELD OF THE DISCLOSURE

One technical field of the present disclosure is computer-implementederror detection and/or error correction in digital datasets. Anothertechnical field is computer-aided analysis of geo-location dataassociated with agricultural field operations such as planting andharvesting.

BACKGROUND

The approaches described in this section are approaches that could bepursued, but not necessarily approaches that have been previouslyconceived or pursued. Therefore, unless otherwise indicated, it shouldnot be assumed that any of the approaches described in this sectionqualify as prior art merely by virtue of their inclusion in thissection.

The analysis of various types of field data, such as planting data andharvest data, depends on the accurate measurement of locations ofagricultural apparatus such as planters and harvesters or combines,which is typically obtained using Global Positioning System (GPS)receivers mounted on the apparatus. Data in the form of GPSlatitude-longitude (lat-long) value pairs, and other metadata, iscollected as the apparatus traverses the field. GPS location data isassociated with each measurement point in a field, such as a start pointor endpoint of a pass of a planter in the field. The GPS data allowsmatching field locations across different data layers that are obtainedat different times during the planting season. Accurate correlation ofthese different datasets, based on geo-location, is crucial to deriveaccurate calculations of yield or other performance factors.

However, poor GPS signal quality can result in inaccurate positionvalues. These errors propagate into field measurements and thereforematching data layers becomes inaccurate. For example, an error in GPSdata could result in correlating a yield value to the wrong treatmentplan or location. Because of the volume of data collected in thismanner, automated processes of error detection and/or correction areneeded to enable more accurate calculation of agricultural data. And,merely detecting error values and generating visual or textual reportsabout error magnitude can assist growers in adjusting equipment or GPSreceivers or in interpreting data that is calculated on the basis of GPSvalues.

One approach to error detection is direct measurement of the signalquality of GPS satellite transmissions, at individual receivers, if theoriginal GPS data stream is available. Signal quality may be measured,for example, by determining the number of GPS satellites to which aparticular receiver established connections; typically, this number isin the range of three to eight. However, original GPS data streamstypically are not available or is impractical to store for a largenumber of fields, field operations such as planting and harvesting, andseasons.

SUMMARY

The appended claims may serve as a summary of the disclosure.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 illustrates an example computer system that is configured toperform the functions described herein, shown in a field environmentwith other apparatus with which the system may interoperate.

FIG. 2 illustrates two views of an example logical organization of setsof instructions in main memory when an example mobile application isloaded for execution.

FIG. 3 illustrates a programmed process by which the agriculturalintelligence computer system generates one or more preconfiguredagronomic models using agronomic data provided by one or more datasources.

FIG. 4 is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system upon whichan embodiment of the invention may be implemented.

FIG. 5 depicts an example embodiment of a timeline view for data entry.

FIG. 6 depicts an example embodiment of a spreadsheet view for dataentry.

FIG. 7 depicts an example embodiment of determining GPS errors betweenobserved data points of planting data and harvesting data.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example field with multiple passes made by aplanter during planting of a hybrid seed.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example embodiment of processing agricultural datarecords and determining planting datasets and harvesting datasets usingagricultural equipment passes.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example embodiment of determining perpendiculardistance values between centroid points of harvesting data values andplanting data values.

FIG. 11A illustrates an example embodiment of processing agriculturaldata records and determining planting datasets and harvesting datasetsbased upon widths of agricultural equipment.

FIG. 11B illustrates an example embodiment of determining matching pairsof planting datasets and harvesting datasets.

FIG. 12 illustrates embodiments of graphical interfaces presented on aclient computer that graphically display the geo-location error valueswithin a field.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, for the purposes of explanation, numerousspecific details are set forth in order to provide a thoroughunderstanding of the present disclosure. It will be apparent, however,that embodiments may be practiced without these specific details. Inother instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in blockdiagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the presentdisclosure. Embodiments are disclosed in sections according to thefollowing outline:

1. GENERAL OVERVIEW

2. EXAMPLE AGRICULTURAL INTELLIGENCE COMPUTER SYSTEM

-   -   2.1. STRUCTURAL OVERVIEW    -   2.2. APPLICATION PROGRAM OVERVIEW    -   2.3. DATA INGEST TO THE COMPUTER SYSTEM    -   2.4. PROCESS OVERVIEW—AGRONOMIC MODEL TRAINING    -   2.5. GPS ERROR DETECTION SUBSYSTEM    -   2.6. IMPLEMENTATION EXAMPLE—HARDWARE OVERVIEW

3. FUNCTIONAL OVERVIEW—GPS ERROR DETECTION

-   -   3.1. GPS ERROR DETECTION—CORRELATING EQUIPMENT PASSES        -   3.1.1. RECEIVING AGRICULTURAL DATA RECORDS        -   3.1.2. PROCESSING AGRICULTURAL DATA RECORDS        -   3.1.3. DETERMINE MATCHING PLANTING PASS AND HARVESTING PASS            PAIRS        -   3.1.4. CALCULATING GPS ERROR VALUES        -   3.1.5. PRESENTING GPS ERROR VALUES    -   3.2. GPS ERROR DETECTION—ITERATIVE APPROACH        -   3.2.1. RECEIVING AGRICULTURAL DATA RECORDS        -   3.2.2. PROCESSING AGRICULTURAL DATA RECORDS        -   3.2.3. DETERMINE MATCHES PLANTING DATASETS        -   3.2.4. CALCULATING GPS ERROR VALUES        -   3.2.5. PRESENTING GPS ERROR VALUES

4. EXTENSIONS AND ALTERNATIVES

1. General Overview

Computer systems and computer-implemented methods for detecting errorsin global positioning system (GPS) data from agricultural apparatus aredisclosed. In an embodiment, a server computer system may receive, overa digital data communication network a plurality of planting data valuesand a plurality of harvesting data values. The planting data values mayinclude geo-location coordinates, such as GPS latitude-longitude values,and timestamps representing the dates and times of observed plantingdata values. The harvesting data values may include geo-locationcoordinates, and timestamps representing the dates and times of observedharvesting data values. The server computer system may generate aplurality of planting datasets and a plurality of harvesting datasets byaggregating planting data values and aggregating harvesting data valuesbased upon geo-location coordinates and timestamps associated with eachof the planting data values and the harvesting data values,respectively.

The server computer system may determine a dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs that represent matching pairs of plantingdatasets to corresponding harvesting datasets based upon proximitiesbetween geo-location coordinates associated with each of the plantingdatasets and the harvesting datasets, respectively. The server computersystem may determine geo-location error values for each of theplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs by determining geo-location offset values between correspondinggeo-locations of each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs. The servercomputer system may present the geo-location error values on a displayscreen of a client computer.

2. Example Agricultural Intelligence Computer System

2.1 Structural Overview

FIG. 1 illustrates an example computer system that is configured toperform the functions described herein, shown in a field environmentwith other apparatus with which the system may interoperate. In oneembodiment, a user 102 owns, operates or possesses a field managercomputing device 104 in a field location or associated with a fieldlocation such as a field intended for agricultural activities or amanagement location for one or more agricultural fields. The fieldmanager computer device 104 is programmed or configured to provide fielddata 106 to an agricultural intelligence computer system 130 via one ormore networks 109.

Examples of field data 106 include (a) identification data (for example,acreage, field name, field identifiers, geographic identifiers, boundaryidentifiers, crop identifiers, and any other suitable data that may beused to identify farm land, such as a common land unit (CLU), lot andblock number, a parcel number, geographic coordinates and boundaries,Farm Serial Number (FSN), farm number, tract number, field number,section, township, and/or range), (b) harvest data (for example, croptype, crop variety, crop rotation, whether the crop is grownorganically, harvest date, Actual Production History (APH), expectedyield, yield, crop price, crop revenue, grain moisture, tillagepractice, and previous growing season information), (c) soil data (forexample, type, composition, pH, organic matter (OM), cation exchangecapacity (CEC)), (d) planting data (for example, planting date, seed(s)type, relative maturity (RM) of planted seed(s), seed population), (e)fertilizer data (for example, nutrient type (Nitrogen, Phosphorous,Potassium), application type, application date, amount, source, method),(f) chemical application data (for example, pesticide, herbicide,fungicide, other substance or mixture of substances intended for use asa plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant, application date, amount,source, method), (g) irrigation data (for example, application date,amount, source, method), (h) weather data (for example, precipitation,rainfall rate, predicted rainfall, water runoff rate region,temperature, wind, forecast, pressure, visibility, clouds, heat index,dew point, humidity, snow depth, air quality, sunrise, sunset), (i)imagery data (for example, imagery and light spectrum information froman agricultural apparatus sensor, camera, computer, smartphone, tablet,unmanned aerial vehicle, planes or satellite), (j) scouting observations(photos, videos, free form notes, voice recordings, voicetranscriptions, weather conditions (temperature, precipitation (currentand over time), soil moisture, crop growth stage, wind velocity,relative humidity, dew point, black layer)), and (k) soil, seed, cropphenology, pest and disease reporting, and predictions sources anddatabases.

A data server computer 108 is communicatively coupled to agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 and is programmed or configured to sendexternal data 110 to agricultural intelligence computer system 130 viathe network(s) 109. The external data server computer 108 may be ownedor operated by the same legal person or entity as the agriculturalintelligence computer system 130, or by a different person or entitysuch as a government agency, non-governmental organization (NGO), and/ora private data service provider. Examples of external data includeweather data, imagery data, soil data, or statistical data relating tocrop yields, among others. External data 110 may consist of the sametype of information as field data 106. In some embodiments, the externaldata 110 is provided by an external data server 108 owned by the sameentity that owns and/or operates the agricultural intelligence computersystem 130. For example, the agricultural intelligence computer system130 may include a data server focused exclusively on a type of data thatmight otherwise be obtained from third party sources, such as weatherdata. In some embodiments, an external data server 108 may actually beincorporated within the system 130.

An agricultural apparatus 111 may have one or more remote sensors 112fixed thereon, which sensors are communicatively coupled either directlyor indirectly via agricultural apparatus 111 to the agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 and are programmed or configured tosend sensor data to agricultural intelligence computer system 130.Examples of agricultural apparatus 111 include tractors, combines,harvesters, planters, trucks, fertilizer equipment, aerial vehiclesincluding unmanned aerial vehicles, and any other item of physicalmachinery or hardware, typically mobile machinery, and which may be usedin tasks associated with agriculture. In some embodiments, a single unitof apparatus 111 may comprise a plurality of sensors 112 that arecoupled locally in a network on the apparatus; controller area network(CAN) is example of such a network that can be installed in combines,harvesters, sprayers, and cultivators. Application controller 114 iscommunicatively coupled to agricultural intelligence computer system 130via the network(s) 109 and is programmed or configured to receive one ormore scripts that are used to control an operating parameter of anagricultural vehicle or implement from the agricultural intelligencecomputer system 130. For instance, a controller area network (CAN) businterface may be used to enable communications from the agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 to the agricultural apparatus 111, suchas how the CLIMATE FIELDVIEW DRIVE, available from The ClimateCorporation, San Francisco, Calif., is used. Sensor data may consist ofthe same type of information as field data 106. In some embodiments,remote sensors 112 may not be fixed to an agricultural apparatus 111 butmay be remotely located in the field and may communicate with network109.

The apparatus 111 may comprise a cab computer 115 that is programmedwith a cab application, which may comprise a version or variant of themobile application for device 104 that is further described in othersections herein. In an embodiment, cab computer 115 comprises a compactcomputer, often a tablet-sized computer or smartphone, with a graphicalscreen display, such as a color display, that is mounted within anoperator's cab of the apparatus 111. Cab computer 115 may implement someor all of the operations and functions that are described further hereinfor the mobile computer device 104.

The network(s) 109 broadly represent any combination of one or more datacommunication networks including local area networks, wide areanetworks, internetworks or internets, using any of wireline or wirelesslinks, including terrestrial or satellite links. The network(s) may beimplemented by any medium or mechanism that provides for the exchange ofdata between the various elements of FIG. 1. The various elements ofFIG. 1 may also have direct (wired or wireless) communications links.The sensors 112, controller 114, external data server computer 108, andother elements of the system each comprise an interface compatible withthe network(s) 109 and are programmed or configured to use standardizedprotocols for communication across the networks such as TCP/IP,Bluetooth, CAN protocol and higher-layer protocols such as HTTP, TLS,and the like.

Agricultural intelligence computer system 130 is programmed orconfigured to receive field data 106 from field manager computing device104, external data 110 from external data server computer 108, andsensor data from remote sensor 112. Agricultural intelligence computersystem 130 may be further configured to host, use or execute one or morecomputer programs, other software elements, digitally programmed logicsuch as FPGAs or ASICs, or any combination thereof to performtranslation and storage of data values, construction of digital modelsof one or more crops on one or more fields, generation ofrecommendations and notifications, and generation and sending of scriptsto application controller 114, in the manner described further in othersections of this disclosure.

In an embodiment, agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isprogrammed with or comprises a communication layer 132, presentationlayer 134, data management layer 140, hardware/virtualization layer 150,and model and field data repository 160. “Layer,” in this context,refers to any combination of electronic digital interface circuits,microcontrollers, firmware such as drivers, and/or computer programs orother software elements.

Communication layer 132 may be programmed or configured to performinput/output interfacing functions including sending requests to fieldmanager computing device 104, external data server computer 108, andremote sensor 112 for field data, external data, and sensor datarespectively. Communication layer 132 may be programmed or configured tosend the received data to model and field data repository 160 to bestored as field data 106.

Presentation layer 134 may be programmed or configured to generate agraphical user interface (GUI) to be displayed on field managercomputing device 104, cab computer 115 or other computers that arecoupled to the system 130 through the network 109. The GUI may comprisecontrols for inputting data to be sent to agricultural intelligencecomputer system 130, generating requests for models and/orrecommendations, and/or displaying recommendations, notifications,models, and other field data.

Data management layer 140 may be programmed or configured to manage readoperations and write operations involving the repository 160 and otherfunctional elements of the system, including queries and result setscommunicated between the functional elements of the system and therepository. Examples of data management layer 140 include JDBC, SQLserver interface code, and/or HADOOP interface code, among others.Repository 160 may comprise a database. As used herein, the term“database” may refer to either a body of data, a relational databasemanagement system (RDBMS), or to both. As used herein, a database maycomprise any collection of data including hierarchical databases,relational databases, flat file databases, object-relational databases,object oriented databases, distributed databases, and any otherstructured collection of records or data that is stored in a computersystem. Examples of RDBMS's include, but are not limited to including,ORACLE®, MYSQL, IBM® DB2, MICROSOFT® SQL SERVER, SYBASE®, and POSTGRESQLdatabases. However, any database may be used that enables the systemsand methods described herein.

When field data 106 is not provided directly to the agriculturalintelligence computer system via one or more agricultural machines oragricultural machine devices that interacts with the agriculturalintelligence computer system, the user may be prompted via one or moreuser interfaces on the user device (served by the agriculturalintelligence computer system) to input such information. In an exampleembodiment, the user may specify identification data by accessing a mapon the user device (served by the agricultural intelligence computersystem) and selecting specific CLUs that have been graphically shown onthe map. In an alternative embodiment, the user 102 may specifyidentification data by accessing a map on the user device (served by theagricultural intelligence computer system 130) and drawing boundaries ofthe field over the map. Such CLU selection or map drawings representgeographic identifiers. In alternative embodiments, the user may specifyidentification data by accessing field identification data (provided asshape files or in a similar format) from the U. S. Department ofAgriculture Farm Service Agency or other source via the user device andproviding such field identification data to the agriculturalintelligence computer system.

In an example embodiment, the agricultural intelligence computer system130 is programmed to generate and cause displaying a graphical userinterface comprising a data manager for data input. After one or morefields have been identified using the methods described above, the datamanager may provide one or more graphical user interface widgets whichwhen selected can identify changes to the field, soil, crops, tillage,or nutrient practices. The data manager may include a timeline view, aspreadsheet view, and/or one or more editable programs.

FIG. 5 depicts an example embodiment of a timeline view for data entry.Using the display depicted in FIG. 5, a user computer can input aselection of a particular field and a particular date for the additionof event. Events depicted at the top of the timeline may includeNitrogen, Planting, Practices, and Soil. To add a nitrogen applicationevent, a user computer may provide input to select the nitrogen tab. Theuser computer may then select a location on the timeline for aparticular field in order to indicate an application of nitrogen on theselected field. In response to receiving a selection of a location onthe timeline for a particular field, the data manager may display a dataentry overlay, allowing the user computer to input data pertaining tonitrogen applications, planting procedures, soil application, tillageprocedures, irrigation practices, or other information relating to theparticular field. For example, if a user computer selects a portion ofthe timeline and indicates an application of nitrogen, then the dataentry overlay may include fields for inputting an amount of nitrogenapplied, a date of application, a type of fertilizer used, and any otherinformation related to the application of nitrogen.

In an embodiment, the data manager provides an interface for creatingone or more programs. “Program,” in this context, refers to a set ofdata pertaining to nitrogen applications, planting procedures, soilapplication, tillage procedures, irrigation practices, or otherinformation that may be related to one or more fields, and that can bestored in digital data storage for reuse as a set in other operations.After a program has been created, it may be conceptually applied to oneor more fields and references to the program may be stored in digitalstorage in association with data identifying the fields. Thus, insteadof manually entering identical data relating to the same nitrogenapplications for multiple different fields, a user computer may create aprogram that indicates a particular application of nitrogen and thenapply the program to multiple different fields. For example, in thetimeline view of FIG. 5, the top two timelines have the “Spring applied”program selected, which includes an application of 150 lbs N/ac in earlyApril. The data manager may provide an interface for editing a program.In an embodiment, when a particular program is edited, each field thathas selected the particular program is edited. For example, in FIG. 5,if the “Spring applied” program is edited to reduce the application ofnitrogen to 130 lbs N/ac, the top two fields may be updated with areduced application of nitrogen based on the edited program.

In an embodiment, in response to receiving edits to a field that has aprogram selected, the data manager removes the correspondence of thefield to the selected program. For example, if a nitrogen application isadded to the top field in FIG. 5, the interface may update to indicatethat the “Spring applied” program is no longer being applied to the topfield. While the nitrogen application in early April may remain, updatesto the “Spring applied” program would not alter the April application ofnitrogen.

FIG. 6 depicts an example embodiment of a spreadsheet view for dataentry. Using the display depicted in FIG. 6, a user can create and editinformation for one or more fields. The data manager may includespreadsheets for inputting information with respect to Nitrogen,Planting, Practices, and Soil as depicted in FIG. 6. To edit aparticular entry, a user computer may select the particular entry in thespreadsheet and update the values. For example, FIG. 6 depicts anin-progress update to a target yield value for the second field.Additionally, a user computer may select one or more fields in order toapply one or more programs. In response to receiving a selection of aprogram for a particular field, the data manager may automaticallycomplete the entries for the particular field based on the selectedprogram. As with the timeline view, the data manager may update theentries for each field associated with a particular program in responseto receiving an update to the program. Additionally, the data managermay remove the correspondence of the selected program to the field inresponse to receiving an edit to one of the entries for the field.

In an embodiment, model and field data is stored in model and field datarepository 160. Model data comprises data models created for one or morefields. For example, a crop model may include a digitally constructedmodel of the development of a crop on the one or more fields. “Model,”in this context, refers to an electronic digitally stored set ofexecutable instructions and data values, associated with one another,which are capable of receiving and responding to a programmatic or otherdigital call, invocation, or request for resolution based upon specifiedinput values, to yield one or more stored or calculated output valuesthat can serve as the basis of computer-implemented recommendations,output data displays, or machine control, among other things. Persons ofskill in the field find it convenient to express models usingmathematical equations, but that form of expression does not confine themodels disclosed herein to abstract concepts; instead, each model hereinhas a practical application in a computer in the form of storedexecutable instructions and data that implement the model using thecomputer. The model may include a model of past events on the one ormore fields, a model of the current status of the one or more fields,and/or a model of predicted events on the one or more fields. Model andfield data may be stored in data structures in memory, rows in adatabase table, in flat files or spreadsheets, or other forms of storeddigital data.

In an embodiment, GPS error detection subsystem 170, and each of itscomponents, comprises a set of one or more pages of main memory, such asRAM, in the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 into whichexecutable instructions have been loaded and which when executed causethe agricultural intelligence computer system to perform the functionsor operations that are described herein with reference to those modules.For example, agricultural data record processing instructions 172 maycomprise a set of pages in RAM that contain instructions which whenexecuted cause performing the target identification functions that aredescribed herein. The instructions may be in machine executable code inthe instruction set of a CPU and may have been compiled based uponsource code written in JAVA, C, C++, OBJECTIVE-C, or any otherhuman-readable programming language or environment, alone or incombination with scripts in JAVASCRIPT, other scripting languages andother programming source text. The term “pages” is intended to referbroadly to any region within main memory and the specific terminologyused in a system may vary depending on the memory architecture orprocessor architecture. In another embodiment, each component of a GPSerror detection subsystem 170 may represent one or more files orprojects of source code that are digitally stored in a mass storagedevice such as non-volatile RAM or disk storage, in the agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 or a separate repository system, whichwhen compiled or interpreted cause generating executable instructionswhich when executed cause the agricultural intelligence computer systemto perform the functions or operations that are described herein withreference to those modules. In other words, the drawing figure mayrepresent the manner in which programmers or software developersorganize and arrange source code for later compilation into anexecutable, or interpretation into bytecode or the equivalent, forexecution by the agricultural intelligence computer system 130.

Hardware/virtualization layer 150 comprises one or more centralprocessing units (CPUs), memory controllers, and other devices,components, or elements of a computer system such as volatile ornon-volatile memory, non-volatile storage such as disk, and I/O devicesor interfaces as illustrated and described, for example, in connectionwith FIG. 4. The layer 150 also may comprise programmed instructionsthat are configured to support virtualization, containerization, orother technologies.

For purposes of illustrating a clear example, FIG. 1 shows a limitednumber of instances of certain functional elements. However, in otherembodiments, there may be any number of such elements. For example,embodiments may use thousands or millions of different mobile computingdevices 104 associated with different users. Further, the system 130and/or external data server computer 108 may be implemented using two ormore processors, cores, clusters, or instances of physical machines orvirtual machines, configured in a discrete location or co-located withother elements in a datacenter, shared computing facility or cloudcomputing facility.

2.2. Application Program Overview

In an embodiment, the implementation of the functions described hereinusing one or more computer programs or other software elements that areloaded into and executed using one or more general-purpose computerswill cause the general-purpose computers to be configured as aparticular machine or as a computer that is specially adapted to performthe functions described herein. Further, each of the flow diagrams thatare described further herein may serve, alone or in combination with thedescriptions of processes and functions in prose herein, as algorithms,plans or directions that may be used to program a computer or logic toimplement the functions that are described. In other words, all theprose text herein, and all the drawing figures, together are intended toprovide disclosure of algorithms, plans or directions that aresufficient to permit a skilled person to program a computer to performthe functions that are described herein, in combination with the skilland knowledge of such a person given the level of skill that isappropriate for inventions and disclosures of this type.

In an embodiment, user 102 interacts with agricultural intelligencecomputer system 130 using field manager computing device 104 configuredwith an operating system and one or more application programs or apps;the field manager computing device 104 also may interoperate with theagricultural intelligence computer system independently andautomatically under program control or logical control and direct userinteraction is not always required. Field manager computing device 104broadly represents one or more of a smart phone, PDA, tablet computingdevice, laptop computer, desktop computer, workstation, or any othercomputing device capable of transmitting and receiving information andperforming the functions described herein. Field manager computingdevice 104 may communicate via a network using a mobile applicationstored on field manager computing device 104, and in some embodiments,the device may be coupled using a cable 113 or connector to the sensor112 and/or controller 114. A particular user 102 may own, operate orpossess and use, in connection with system 130, more than one fieldmanager computing device 104 at a time.

The mobile application may provide client-side functionality, via thenetwork to one or more mobile computing devices. In an exampleembodiment, field manager computing device 104 may access the mobileapplication via a web browser or a local client application or app.Field manager computing device 104 may transmit data to, and receivedata from, one or more front-end servers, using web-based protocols orformats such as HTTP, XML and/or JSON, or app-specific protocols. In anexample embodiment, the data may take the form of requests and userinformation input, such as field data, into the mobile computing device.In some embodiments, the mobile application interacts with locationtracking hardware and software on field manager computing device 104which determines the location of field manager computing device 104using standard tracking techniques such as multilateration of radiosignals, the global positioning system (GPS), WiFi positioning systems,or other methods of mobile positioning. In some cases, location data orother data associated with the device 104, user 102, and/or useraccount(s) may be obtained by queries to an operating system of thedevice or by requesting an app on the device to obtain data from theoperating system.

In an embodiment, field manager computing device 104 sends field data106 to agricultural intelligence computer system 130 comprising orincluding, but not limited to, data values representing one or more of:a geographical location of the one or more fields, tillage informationfor the one or more fields, crops planted in the one or more fields, andsoil data extracted from the one or more fields. Field manager computingdevice 104 may send field data 106 in response to user input from user102 specifying the data values for the one or more fields. Additionally,field manager computing device 104 may automatically send field data 106when one or more of the data values becomes available to field managercomputing device 104. For example, field manager computing device 104may be communicatively coupled to remote sensor 112 and/or applicationcontroller 114 which include an irrigation sensor and/or irrigationcontroller. In response to receiving data indicating that applicationcontroller 114 released water onto the one or more fields, field managercomputing device 104 may send field data 106 to agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 indicating that water was released onthe one or more fields. Field data 106 identified in this disclosure maybe input and communicated using electronic digital data that iscommunicated between computing devices using parameterized URLs overHTTP, or another suitable communication or messaging protocol.

A commercial example of the mobile application is CLIMATE FIELDVIEW,commercially available from The Climate Corporation, San Francisco,Calif. The CLIMATE FIELDVIEW application, or other applications, may bemodified, extended, or adapted to include features, functions, andprogramming that have not been disclosed earlier than the filing date ofthis disclosure. In one embodiment, the mobile application comprises anintegrated software platform that allows a grower to make fact-baseddecisions for their operation because it combines historical data aboutthe grower's fields with any other data that the grower wishes tocompare. The combinations and comparisons may be performed in real timeand are based upon scientific models that provide potential scenarios topermit the grower to make better, more informed decisions.

FIG. 2 illustrates two views of an example logical organization of setsof instructions in main memory when an example mobile application isloaded for execution. In FIG. 2, each named element represents a regionof one or more pages of RAM or other main memory, or one or more blocksof disk storage or other non-volatile storage, and the programmedinstructions within those regions. In one embodiment, in view (a), amobile computer application 200 comprises account-fields-dataingestion-sharing instructions 202, overview and alert instructions 204,digital map book instructions 206, seeds and planting instructions 208,nitrogen instructions 210, weather instructions 212, field healthinstructions 214, and performance instructions 216.

In one embodiment, a mobile computer application 200 comprises account,fields, data ingestion, sharing instructions 202 which are programmed toreceive, translate, and ingest field data from third party systems viamanual upload or APIs. Data types may include field boundaries, yieldmaps, as-planted maps, soil test results, as-applied maps, and/ormanagement zones, among others. Data formats may include shape files,native data formats of third parties, and/or farm management informationsystem (FMIS) exports, among others. Receiving data may occur via manualupload, e-mail with attachment, external APIs that push data to themobile application, or instructions that call APIs of external systemsto pull data into the mobile application. In one embodiment, mobilecomputer application 200 comprises a data inbox. In response toreceiving a selection of the data inbox, the mobile computer application200 may display a graphical user interface for manually uploading datafiles and importing uploaded files to a data manager.

In one embodiment, digital map book instructions 206 comprise field mapdata layers stored in device memory and are programmed with datavisualization tools and geospatial field notes. This provides growerswith convenient information close at hand for reference, logging andvisual insights into field performance. In one embodiment, overview andalert instructions 204 are programmed to provide an operation-wide viewof what is important to the grower, and timely recommendations to takeaction or focus on particular issues. This permits the grower to focustime on what needs attention, to save time and preserve yield throughoutthe season. In one embodiment, seeds and planting instructions 208 areprogrammed to provide tools for seed selection, hybrid placement, andscript creation, including variable rate (VR) script creation, basedupon scientific models and empirical data. This enables growers tomaximize yield or return on investment through optimized seed purchase,placement and population.

In one embodiment, script generation instructions 205 are programmed toprovide an interface for generating scripts, including variable rate(VR) fertility scripts. The interface enables growers to create scriptsfor field implements, such as nutrient applications, planting, andirrigation. For example, a planting script interface may comprise toolsfor identifying a type of seed for planting. Upon receiving a selectionof the seed type, mobile computer application 200 may display one ormore fields broken into management zones, such as the field map datalayers created as part of digital map book instructions 206. In oneembodiment, the management zones comprise soil zones along with a panelidentifying each soil zone and a soil name, texture, drainage for eachzone, or other field data. Mobile computer application 200 may alsodisplay tools for editing or creating such, such as graphical tools fordrawing management zones, such as soil zones, over a map of one or morefields. Planting procedures may be applied to all management zones ordifferent planting procedures may be applied to different subsets ofmanagement zones. When a script is created, mobile computer application200 may make the script available for download in a format readable byan application controller, such as an archived or compressed format.Additionally, and/or alternatively, a script may be sent directly to cabcomputer 115 from mobile computer application 200 and/or uploaded to oneor more data servers and stored for further use.

In one embodiment, nitrogen instructions 210 are programmed to providetools to inform nitrogen decisions by visualizing the availability ofnitrogen to crops. This enables growers to maximize yield or return oninvestment through optimized nitrogen application during the season.Example programmed functions include displaying images such as SSURGOimages to enable drawing of fertilizer application zones and/or imagesgenerated from subfield soil data, such as data obtained from sensors,at a high spatial resolution (as fine as millimeters or smallerdepending on sensor proximity and resolution); upload of existinggrower-defined zones; providing a graph of plant nutrient availabilityand/or a map to enable tuning application(s) of nitrogen across multiplezones; output of scripts to drive machinery; tools for mass data entryand adjustment; and/or maps for data visualization, among others. “Massdata entry,” in this context, may mean entering data once and thenapplying the same data to multiple fields and/or zones that have beendefined in the system; example data may include nitrogen applicationdata that is the same for many fields and/or zones of the same grower,but such mass data entry applies to the entry of any type of field datainto the mobile computer application 200. For example, nitrogeninstructions 210 may be programmed to accept definitions of nitrogenapplication and practices programs and to accept user input specifyingto apply those programs across multiple fields. “Nitrogen applicationprograms,” in this context, refers to stored, named sets of data thatassociates: a name, color code or other identifier, one or more dates ofapplication, types of material or product for each of the dates andamounts, method of application or incorporation such as injected orbroadcast, and/or amounts or rates of application for each of the dates,crop or hybrid that is the subject of the application, among others.“Nitrogen practices programs,” in this context, refer to stored, namedsets of data that associates: a practices name; a previous crop; atillage system; a date of primarily tillage; one or more previoustillage systems that were used; one or more indicators of applicationtype, such as manure, that were used. Nitrogen instructions 210 also maybe programmed to generate and cause displaying a nitrogen graph, whichindicates projections of plant use of the specified nitrogen and whethera surplus or shortfall is predicted; in some embodiments, differentcolor indicators may signal a magnitude of surplus or magnitude ofshortfall. In one embodiment, a nitrogen graph comprises a graphicaldisplay in a computer display device comprising a plurality of rows,each row associated with and identifying a field; data specifying whatcrop is planted in the field, the field size, the field location, and agraphic representation of the field perimeter; in each row, a timelineby month with graphic indicators specifying each nitrogen applicationand amount at points correlated to month names; and numeric and/orcolored indicators of surplus or shortfall, in which color indicatesmagnitude.

In one embodiment, the nitrogen graph may include one or more user inputfeatures, such as dials or slider bars, to dynamically change thenitrogen planting and practices programs so that a user may optimize hisnitrogen graph. The user may then use his optimized nitrogen graph andthe related nitrogen planting and practices programs to implement one ormore scripts, including variable rate (VR) fertility scripts. Nitrogeninstructions 210 also may be programmed to generate and cause displayinga nitrogen map, which indicates projections of plant use of thespecified nitrogen and whether a surplus or shortfall is predicted; insome embodiments, different color indicators may signal a magnitude ofsurplus or magnitude of shortfall. The nitrogen map may displayprojections of plant use of the specified nitrogen and whether a surplusor shortfall is predicted for different times in the past and the future(such as daily, weekly, monthly or yearly) using numeric and/or coloredindicators of surplus or shortfall, in which color indicates magnitude.In one embodiment, the nitrogen map may include one or more user inputfeatures, such as dials or slider bars, to dynamically change thenitrogen planting and practices programs so that a user may optimize hisnitrogen map, such as to obtain a preferred amount of surplus toshortfall. The user may then use his optimized nitrogen map and therelated nitrogen planting and practices programs to implement one ormore scripts, including variable rate (VR) fertility scripts. In otherembodiments, similar instructions to the nitrogen instructions 210 couldbe used for application of other nutrients (such as phosphorus andpotassium), application of pesticide, and irrigation programs.

In one embodiment, weather instructions 212 are programmed to providefield-specific recent weather data and forecasted weather information.This enables growers to save time and have an efficient integrateddisplay with respect to daily operational decisions.

In one embodiment, field health instructions 214 are programmed toprovide timely remote sensing images highlighting in-season cropvariation and potential concerns. Example programmed functions includecloud checking, to identify possible clouds or cloud shadows;determining nitrogen indices based on field images; graphicalvisualization of scouting layers, including, for example, those relatedto field health, and viewing and/or sharing of scouting notes; and/ordownloading satellite images from multiple sources and prioritizing theimages for the grower, among others.

In one embodiment, performance instructions 216 are programmed toprovide reports, analysis, and insight tools using on-farm data forevaluation, insights and decisions. This enables the grower to seekimproved outcomes for the next year through fact-based conclusions aboutwhy return on investment was at prior levels, and insight intoyield-limiting factors. The performance instructions 216 may beprogrammed to communicate via the network(s) 109 to back-end analyticsprograms executed at agricultural intelligence computer system 130and/or external data server computer 108 and configured to analyzemetrics such as yield, yield differential, hybrid, population, SSURGOzone, soil test properties, or elevation, among others. Programmedreports and analysis may include yield variability analysis, treatmenteffect estimation, benchmarking of yield and other metrics against othergrowers based on anonymized data collected from many growers, or datafor seeds and planting, among others.

Applications having instructions configured in this way may beimplemented for different computing device platforms while retaining thesame general user interface appearance. For example, the mobileapplication may be programmed for execution on tablets, smartphones, orserver computers that are accessed using browsers at client computers.Further, the mobile application as configured for tablet computers orsmartphones may provide a full app experience or a cab app experiencethat is suitable for the display and processing capabilities of cabcomputer 115. For example, referring now to view (b) of FIG. 2, in oneembodiment a cab computer application 220 may comprise maps-cabinstructions 222, remote view instructions 224, data collect andtransfer instructions 226, machine alerts instructions 228, scripttransfer instructions 230, and scouting-cab instructions 232. The codebase for the instructions of view (b) may be the same as for view (a)and executables implementing the code may be programmed to detect thetype of platform on which they are executing and to expose, through agraphical user interface, only those functions that are appropriate to acab platform or full platform. This approach enables the system torecognize the distinctly different user experience that is appropriatefor an in-cab environment and the different technology environment ofthe cab. The maps-cab instructions 222 may be programmed to provide mapviews of fields, farms or regions that are useful in directing machineoperation. The remote view instructions 224 may be programmed to turnon, manage, and provide views of machine activity in real-time or nearreal-time to other computing devices connected to the system 130 viawireless networks, wired connectors or adapters, and the like. The datacollect and transfer instructions 226 may be programmed to turn on,manage, and provide transfer of data collected at sensors andcontrollers to the system 130 via wireless networks, wired connectors oradapters, and the like. The machine alerts instructions 228 may beprogrammed to detect issues with operations of the machine or tools thatare associated with the cab and generate operator alerts. The scripttransfer instructions 230 may be configured to transfer in scripts ofinstructions that are configured to direct machine operations or thecollection of data. The scouting-cab instructions 232 may be programmedto display location-based alerts and information received from thesystem 130 based on the location of the field manager computing device104, agricultural apparatus 111, or sensors 112 in the field and ingest,manage, and provide transfer of location-based scouting observations tothe system 130 based on the location of the agricultural apparatus 111or sensors 112 in the field.

2.3. Data Ingest to the Computer System

In an embodiment, external data server computer 108 stores external data110, including soil data representing soil composition for the one ormore fields and weather data representing temperature and precipitationon the one or more fields. The weather data may include past and presentweather data as well as forecasts for future weather data. In anembodiment, external data server computer 108 comprises a plurality ofservers hosted by different entities. For example, a first server maycontain soil composition data while a second server may include weatherdata. Additionally, soil composition data may be stored in multipleservers. For example, one server may store data representing percentageof sand, silt, and clay in the soil while a second server may store datarepresenting percentage of organic matter (OM) in the soil.

In an embodiment, remote sensor 112 comprises one or more sensors thatare programmed or configured to produce one or more observations. Remotesensor 112 may be aerial sensors, such as satellites, vehicle sensors,planting equipment sensors, tillage sensors, fertilizer or insecticideapplication sensors, harvester sensors, and any other implement capableof receiving data from the one or more fields. In an embodiment,application controller 114 is programmed or configured to receiveinstructions from agricultural intelligence computer system 130.Application controller 114 may also be programmed or configured tocontrol an operating parameter of an agricultural vehicle or implement.For example, an application controller may be programmed or configuredto control an operating parameter of a vehicle, such as a tractor,planting equipment, tillage equipment, fertilizer or insecticideequipment, harvester equipment, or other farm implements such as a watervalve. Other embodiments may use any combination of sensors andcontrollers, of which the following are merely selected examples.

The system 130 may obtain or ingest data under user 102 control, on amass basis from a large number of growers who have contributed data to ashared database system. This form of obtaining data may be termed“manual data ingest” as one or more user-controlled computer operationsare requested or triggered to obtain data for use by the system 130. Asan example, the CLIMATE FIELDVIEW application, commercially availablefrom The Climate Corporation, San Francisco, Calif., may be operated toexport data to system 130 for storing in the repository 160.

For example, seed monitor systems can both control planter apparatuscomponents and obtain planting data, including signals from seed sensorsvia a signal harness that comprises a CAN backbone and point-to-pointconnections for registration and/or diagnostics. Seed monitor systemscan be programmed or configured to display seed spacing, population andother information to the user via the cab computer 115 or other deviceswithin the system 130. Examples are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,738,243and US Pat. Pub. 20150094916, and the present disclosure assumesknowledge of those other patent disclosures.

Likewise, yield monitor systems may contain yield sensors for harvesterapparatus that send yield measurement data to the cab computer 115 orother devices within the system 130. Yield monitor systems may utilizeone or more remote sensors 112 to obtain grain moisture measurements ina combine or other harvester and transmit these measurements to the uservia the cab computer 115 or other devices within the system 130.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used with anymoving vehicle or apparatus of the type described elsewhere hereininclude kinematic sensors and position sensors. Kinematic sensors maycomprise any of speed sensors such as radar or wheel speed sensors,accelerometers, or gyros. Position sensors may comprise GPS receivers ortransceivers, or WiFi-based position or mapping apps that are programmedto determine location based upon nearby WiFi hotspots, among others.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used with tractorsor other moving vehicles include engine speed sensors, fuel consumptionsensors, area counters or distance counters that interact with GPS orradar signals, PTO (power take-off) speed sensors, tractor hydraulicssensors configured to detect hydraulics parameters such as pressure orflow, and/or and hydraulic pump speed, wheel speed sensors or wheelslippage sensors. In an embodiment, examples of controllers 114 that maybe used with tractors include hydraulic directional controllers,pressure controllers, and/or flow controllers; hydraulic pump speedcontrollers; speed controllers or governors; hitch position controllers;or wheel position controllers provide automatic steering.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used with seedplanting equipment such as planters, drills, or air seeders include seedsensors, which may be optical, electromagnetic, or impact sensors;downforce sensors such as load pins, load cells, pressure sensors; soilproperty sensors such as reflectivity sensors, moisture sensors,electrical conductivity sensors, optical residue sensors, or temperaturesensors; component operating criteria sensors such as planting depthsensors, downforce cylinder pressure sensors, seed disc speed sensors,seed drive motor encoders, seed conveyor system speed sensors, or vacuumlevel sensors; or pesticide application sensors such as optical or otherelectromagnetic sensors, or impact sensors. In an embodiment, examplesof controllers 114 that may be used with such seed planting equipmentinclude: toolbar fold controllers, such as controllers for valvesassociated with hydraulic cylinders; downforce controllers, such ascontrollers for valves associated with pneumatic cylinders, airbags, orhydraulic cylinders, and programmed for applying downforce to individualrow units or an entire planter frame; planting depth controllers, suchas linear actuators; metering controllers, such as electric seed meterdrive motors, hydraulic seed meter drive motors, or swath controlclutches; hybrid selection controllers, such as seed meter drive motors,or other actuators programmed for selectively allowing or preventingseed or an air-seed mixture from delivering seed to or from seed metersor central bulk hoppers; metering controllers, such as electric seedmeter drive motors, or hydraulic seed meter drive motors; seed conveyorsystem controllers, such as controllers for a belt seed deliveryconveyor motor; marker controllers, such as a controller for a pneumaticor hydraulic actuator; or pesticide application rate controllers, suchas metering drive controllers, orifice size or position controllers.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used with tillageequipment include position sensors for tools such as shanks or discs;tool position sensors for such tools that are configured to detectdepth, gang angle, or lateral spacing; downforce sensors; or draft forcesensors. In an embodiment, examples of controllers 114 that may be usedwith tillage equipment include downforce controllers or tool positioncontrollers, such as controllers configured to control tool depth, gangangle, or lateral spacing.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used in relationto apparatus for applying fertilizer, insecticide, fungicide and thelike, such as on-planter starter fertilizer systems, subsoil fertilizerapplicators, or fertilizer sprayers, include: fluid system criteriasensors, such as flow sensors or pressure sensors; sensors indicatingwhich spray head valves or fluid line valves are open; sensorsassociated with tanks, such as fill level sensors; sectional orsystem-wide supply line sensors, or row-specific supply line sensors; orkinematic sensors such as accelerometers disposed on sprayer booms. Inan embodiment, examples of controllers 114 that may be used with suchapparatus include pump speed controllers; valve controllers that areprogrammed to control pressure, flow, direction, PWM and the like; orposition actuators, such as for boom height, subsoiler depth, or boomposition.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used withharvesters include yield monitors, such as impact plate strain gauges orposition sensors, capacitive flow sensors, load sensors, weight sensors,or torque sensors associated with elevators or augers, or optical orother electromagnetic grain height sensors; grain moisture sensors, suchas capacitive sensors; grain loss sensors, including impact, optical, orcapacitive sensors; header operating criteria sensors such as headerheight, header type, deck plate gap, feeder speed, and reel speedsensors; separator operating criteria sensors, such as concaveclearance, rotor speed, shoe clearance, or chaffer clearance sensors;auger sensors for position, operation, or speed; or engine speedsensors. In an embodiment, examples of controllers 114 that may be usedwith harvesters include header operating criteria controllers forelements such as header height, header type, deck plate gap, feederspeed, or reel speed; separator operating criteria controllers forfeatures such as concave clearance, rotor speed, shoe clearance, orchaffer clearance; or controllers for auger position, operation, orspeed.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 that may be used with graincarts include weight sensors, or sensors for auger position, operation,or speed. In an embodiment, examples of controllers 114 that may be usedwith grain carts include controllers for auger position, operation, orspeed.

In an embodiment, examples of sensors 112 and controllers 114 may beinstalled in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) apparatus or “drones.” Suchsensors may include cameras with detectors effective for any range ofthe electromagnetic spectrum including visible light, infrared,ultraviolet, near-infrared (NIR), and the like; accelerometers;altimeters; temperature sensors; humidity sensors; pitot tube sensors orother airspeed or wind velocity sensors; battery life sensors; or radaremitters and reflected radar energy detection apparatus; otherelectromagnetic radiation emitters and reflected electromagneticradiation detection apparatus. Such controllers may include guidance ormotor control apparatus, control surface controllers, cameracontrollers, or controllers programmed to turn on, operate, obtain datafrom, manage and configure any of the foregoing sensors. Examples aredisclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/831,165 and the presentdisclosure assumes knowledge of that other patent disclosure.

In an embodiment, sensors 112 and controllers 114 may be affixed to soilsampling and measurement apparatus that is configured or programmed tosample soil and perform soil chemistry tests, soil moisture tests, andother tests pertaining to soil. For example, the apparatus disclosed inU.S. Pat. Nos. 8,767,194 and 8,712,148 may be used, and the presentdisclosure assumes knowledge of those patent disclosures.

In an embodiment, sensors 112 and controllers 114 may comprise weatherdevices for monitoring weather conditions of fields. For example, theapparatus disclosed in U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/154,207,filed on Apr. 29, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/175,160,filed on Jun. 12, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/198,060,filed on Jul. 28, 2015, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/220,852,filed on Sep. 18, 2015, may be used, and the present disclosure assumesknowledge of those patent disclosures.

2.4. Process Overview-Agronomic Model Training

In an embodiment, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isprogrammed or configured to create an agronomic model. In this context,an agronomic model is a data structure in memory of the agriculturalintelligence computer system 130 that comprises field data 106, such asidentification data and harvest data for one or more fields. Theagronomic model may also comprise calculated agronomic properties whichdescribe either conditions which may affect the growth of one or morecrops on a field, or properties of the one or more crops, or both.Additionally, an agronomic model may comprise recommendations based onagronomic factors such as crop recommendations, irrigationrecommendations, planting recommendations, fertilizer recommendations,fungicide recommendations, pesticide recommendations, harvestingrecommendations and other crop management recommendations. The agronomicfactors may also be used to estimate one or more crop related results,such as agronomic yield. The agronomic yield of a crop is an estimate ofquantity of the crop that is produced, or in some examples the revenueor profit obtained from the produced crop.

In an embodiment, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 mayuse a preconfigured agronomic model to calculate agronomic propertiesrelated to currently received location and crop information for one ormore fields. The preconfigured agronomic model is based upon previouslyprocessed field data, including but not limited to, identification data,harvest data, fertilizer data, and weather data. The preconfiguredagronomic model may have been cross validated to ensure accuracy of themodel. Cross validation may include comparison to ground truthing thatcompares predicted results with actual results on a field, such as acomparison of precipitation estimate with a rain gauge or sensorproviding weather data at the same or nearby location or an estimate ofnitrogen content with a soil sample measurement.

FIG. 3 illustrates a programmed process by which the agriculturalintelligence computer system generates one or more preconfiguredagronomic models using field data provided by one or more data sources.FIG. 3 may serve as an algorithm or instructions for programming thefunctional elements of the agricultural intelligence computer system 130to perform the operations that are now described.

At block 305, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isconfigured or programmed to implement agronomic data preprocessing offield data received from one or more data sources. The field datareceived from one or more data sources may be preprocessed for thepurpose of removing noise, distorting effects, and confounding factorswithin the agronomic data including measured outliers that couldadversely affect received field data values. Embodiments of agronomicdata preprocessing may include, but are not limited to, removing datavalues commonly associated with outlier data values, specific measureddata points that are known to unnecessarily skew other data values, datasmoothing, aggregation, or sampling techniques used to remove or reduceadditive or multiplicative effects from noise, and other filtering ordata derivation techniques used to provide clear distinctions betweenpositive and negative data inputs.

At block 310, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isconfigured or programmed to perform data subset selection using thepreprocessed field data in order to identify datasets useful for initialagronomic model generation. The agricultural intelligence computersystem 130 may implement data subset selection techniques including, butnot limited to, a genetic algorithm method, an all subset models method,a sequential search method, a stepwise regression method, a particleswarm optimization method, and an ant colony optimization method. Forexample, a genetic algorithm selection technique uses an adaptiveheuristic search algorithm, based on evolutionary principles of naturalselection and genetics, to determine and evaluate datasets within thepreprocessed agronomic data.

At block 315, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isconfigured or programmed to implement field dataset evaluation. In anembodiment, a specific field dataset is evaluated by creating anagronomic model and using specific quality thresholds for the createdagronomic model. Agronomic models may be compared and/or validated usingone or more comparison techniques, such as, but not limited to, rootmean square error with leave-one-out cross validation (RMSECV), meanabsolute error, and mean percentage error. For example, RMSECV can crossvalidate agronomic models by comparing predicted agronomic propertyvalues created by the agronomic model against historical agronomicproperty values collected and analyzed. In an embodiment, the agronomicdataset evaluation logic is used as a feedback loop where agronomicdatasets that do not meet configured quality thresholds are used duringfuture data subset selection steps (block 310).

At block 320, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isconfigured or programmed to implement agronomic model creation basedupon the cross validated agronomic datasets. In an embodiment, agronomicmodel creation may implement multivariate regression techniques tocreate preconfigured agronomic data models.

At block 325, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130 isconfigured or programmed to store the preconfigured agronomic datamodels for future field data evaluation.

2.5. GPS Error Detection Subsystem

In an embodiment, the agricultural intelligence computer system 130,among other components, includes the GPS error detection subsystem 170.The GPS error detection subsystem 170 is programmed or configured todetermine GPS errors between observed GPS planting data and observed GPSharvesting data. In an embodiment, the GPS error detection subsystem 170may process agricultural data records to generate datasets of plantingdata and harvesting data that have been aggregated based upongeo-location and timestamps. In an embodiment, the agricultural datarecords may include observed geo-location information from plantersplanting hybrid seeds and from harvesters harvesting crop fromagricultural fields. The agricultural data records may include plantingdata values and harvesting data values. The planting data values mayinclude geo-location coordinates, such as GPS latitude-longitude values,timestamps representing the dates and times of observed planting datavalues, machine configuration data, such as a planter model identifierand a width of the planter, and treatment information including hybridseed type. The harvesting data values may include geo-locationcoordinates, timestamps representing the dates and times of observedharvesting data values, and machine configuration data.

In an embodiment, the planting and harvesting datasets may be analyzedto determine corresponding matching planting and harvesting data points.The matching planting and harvesting data points are used to correlateplanting geo-locations to harvesting geo-locations. The GPS errordetection subsystem 170 may determine whether a GPS error exists betweenthe planting geo-locations and their corresponding harvestinggeo-locations. If a GPS error exists, then the GPS error detectionsubsystem 170 may calculate the size of the GPS error for each observedgeo-location within a field.

In an embodiment, the GPS error detection subsystem 170 may comprise orbe programmed with agricultural data record processing instructions 172,data point correlation instructions 174, and geo-location errorcalculation instructions 176. The agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 provide instructions to process agricultural datarecords containing planting data values and harvesting data values togenerate planting datasets and harvesting datasets. The plantingdatasets may represent a set of planting data values that have beenaggregated based upon their proximity to each other and/or theirtimestamp values. The harvesting datasets may represent a set ofharvesting data values that have been aggregated based upon theirproximity to each other and their timestamp values. The data pointcorrelation instructions 174 provide instructions to identify potentialplanting dataset and harvesting dataset pairs based on geo-locationproximities of each of the planting and harvesting datasets. Thegeo-location error calculation instructions 176 provide instructions todetermine an amount of GPS error based upon differences betweengeo-locations of data values of planting datasets and correspondingharvesting datasets from the planting-to-harvesting dataset pairs.

2.6. Implementation Example—Hardware Overview

According to one embodiment, the techniques described herein areimplemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices. Thespecial-purpose computing devices may be hard-wired to perform thetechniques, or may include digital electronic devices such as one ormore application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or fieldprogrammable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed toperform the techniques, or may include one or more general purposehardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant toprogram instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or acombination. Such special-purpose computing devices may also combinecustom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming toaccomplish the techniques. The special-purpose computing devices may bedesktop computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices,networking devices or any other device that incorporates hard-wiredand/or program logic to implement the techniques.

For example, FIG. 4 is a block diagram that illustrates a computersystem 400 upon which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented.Computer system 400 includes a bus 402 or other communication mechanismfor communicating information, and a hardware processor 404 coupled withbus 402 for processing information. Hardware processor 404 may be, forexample, a general purpose microprocessor.

Computer system 400 also includes a main memory 406, such as a randomaccess memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 402for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor404. Main memory 406 also may be used for storing temporary variables orother intermediate information during execution of instructions to beexecuted by processor 404. Such instructions, when stored innon-transitory storage media accessible to processor 404, rendercomputer system 400 into a special-purpose machine that is customized toperform the operations specified in the instructions.

Computer system 400 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 408 orother static storage device coupled to bus 402 for storing staticinformation and instructions for processor 404. A storage device 410,such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or solid-state drive is providedand coupled to bus 402 for storing information and instructions.

Computer system 400 may be coupled via bus 402 to a display 412, such asa cathode ray tube (CRT), for displaying information to a computer user.An input device 414, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupledto bus 402 for communicating information and command selections toprocessor 404. Another type of user input device is cursor control 416,such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicatingdirection information and command selections to processor 404 and forcontrolling cursor movement on display 412. This input device typicallyhas two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and asecond axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in aplane.

Computer system 400 may implement the techniques described herein usingcustomized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/orprogram logic which in combination with the computer system causes orprograms computer system 400 to be a special-purpose machine. Accordingto one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed by computersystem 400 in response to processor 404 executing one or more sequencesof one or more instructions contained in main memory 406. Suchinstructions may be read into main memory 406 from another storagemedium, such as storage device 410. Execution of the sequences ofinstructions contained in main memory 406 causes processor 404 toperform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments,hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination withsoftware instructions.

The term “storage media” as used herein refers to any non-transitorymedia that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine tooperate in a specific fashion. Such storage media may comprisenon-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes,for example, optical disks, magnetic disks, or solid-state drives, suchas storage device 410. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such asmain memory 406. Common forms of storage media include, for example, afloppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid-state drive, magnetictape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any otheroptical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes,a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip orcartridge.

Storage media is distinct from but may be used in conjunction withtransmission media. Transmission media participates in transferringinformation between storage media. For example, transmission mediaincludes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including thewires that comprise bus 402. Transmission media can also take the formof acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-waveand infrared data communications.

Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequencesof one or more instructions to processor 404 for execution. For example,the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk orsolid-state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load theinstructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over atelephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 400 canreceive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitterto convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector canreceive the data carried in the infrared signal and appropriatecircuitry can place the data on bus 402. Bus 402 carries the data tomain memory 406, from which processor 404 retrieves and executes theinstructions. The instructions received by main memory 406 mayoptionally be stored on storage device 410 either before or afterexecution by processor 404.

Computer system 400 also includes a communication interface 418 coupledto bus 402. Communication interface 418 provides a two-way datacommunication coupling to a network link 420 that is connected to alocal network 422. For example, communication interface 418 may be anintegrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellitemodem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to acorresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communicationinterface 418 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a datacommunication connection to a compatible LAN. Wireless links may also beimplemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 418sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals thatcarry digital data streams representing various types of information.

Network link 420 typically provides data communication through one ormore networks to other data devices. For example, network link 420 mayprovide a connection through local network 422 to a host computer 424 orto data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 426.ISP 426 in turn provides data communication services through theworldwide packet data communication network now commonly referred to asthe “Internet” 428. Local network 422 and Internet 428 both useelectrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital datastreams. The signals through the various networks and the signals onnetwork link 420 and through communication interface 418, which carrythe digital data to and from computer system 400, are example forms oftransmission media.

Computer system 400 can send messages and receive data, includingprogram code, through the network(s), network link 420 and communicationinterface 418. In the Internet example, a server 430 might transmit arequested code for an application program through Internet 428, ISP 426,local network 422 and communication interface 418.

The received code may be executed by processor 404 as it is received,and/or stored in storage device 410, or other non-volatile storage forlater execution.

3. Functional Overview—GPS Error Detection

In an embodiment, a computer-implemented process to detect GPS errors isfounded on the expectation that the full width of a combine or harvesteris expected to fall within the space covered by a single treatment thatoccurred previously in the season. This assumption is valid because inplanting and treatment measurements, individual rows of a field do nothave separate measurements. Therefore, if a combine's header fallsoutside the coverage of a treatment, then either an operator error orGPS error is detected. In either case, data calculated for theperformance of a treatment most likely is inaccurate. FIG. 7 illustratesan example embodiment of determining GPS errors between observed datapoints of planting data and harvesting data. FIG. 7 may be programmed inprogram instructions as part of the instruction sets that have beenpreviously described in section 2.5.

3.1. GPS Error Detection—Correlating Equipment Passes

In an embodiment, one method for determining GPS errors between datapoints of planting data and harvesting data may include an approach ofidentifying sets of agricultural data records based upon passes ofagricultural equipment during treatment of a field. For example,agricultural equipment, such as a planter or harvester, may treat afield by performing several horizontal or vertical passes across a fielduntil the entire area of the field has been treated. Each pass may starton one side of the field and may span across an entire length of thefield until the end of the field is reached. FIG. 8 illustrates anexample field with multiple passes made by a planter during planting ofa hybrid seed. Field 805 represents a field in which a planter has madeseveral planting passes across the field to plant a hybrid seed. Pass810 represent a single pass of the planter starting from the left endand moving across the field to the right end. Agricultural equipment,when treating a field may make several incremental passes across thefield in order to systematically cover the entire field. Planting datavalues 815 represent captured geo-location information where hybrid seedwas deposited during planting. Each “+” symbol may represent ageo-location where hybrid seed was deposited into the field.

3.1.1. Receiving Agricultural Data Records

At block 705, computer system 130 is programmed to receive agriculturaldata records for one or more fields. In an embodiment, the agriculturaldata records received by system 130 may include multiple layers ofobserved treatment data. Layers of treatment data may refer to differenttypes of treatment events on fields. Examples of treatment may include,but are not limited to, planting hybrid seeds, harvesting crops,applying specific crop treatment, and any other type of field treatmentapplied to specific geo-locations within the field. Examples ofdifferent treatment layers may include a planting layer that representsplanting data values observed during planting of hybrid seeds and aharvesting layer that represents harvesting data values observed duringharvesting of crops. Planting data values may include data correspondingto geo-location coordinates, such as GPS latitude-longitude values,Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates, or any othercommercially available geographic coordinate units, timestampsrepresenting the dates and times of observed planting data values,machine configuration data, such as a planter model identifier and awidth of the planter, and treatment information including treatment typeand hybrid seed type. Harvesting data values may include datacorresponding to geo-location coordinates, timestamps of when crop isharvested at the specific geo-location, and machine configuration data.

In an embodiment, the agricultural data records may be received fromfield data 106 collected from agricultural machines such as planters andharvesters. For example, a planter may be used to plant hybrid seeds onmultiple parallel rows of a field at the same time. The planter maycollect planting data values from seed sensors configured to detect thetime and location of when a seed is planted in a field. Planters may beequipped with multiple seed sensors. For instance, planters may beequipped with a transversely extending toolbar with multiple row unitsmounted. A row unit is an apparatus configured to plant seeds in a rowof the field. Each row unit may deposit a seed into the ground at aconfigured interval and an attached seed sensor may detect the time whenthe seed is deposited. The seed sensors may also be equipped with a GPSsensor for detecting GPS coordinates of each seed deposited, or anyother geo-location sensor.

In another example, a harvester may be equipped with multipleGPS-enabled harvest sensors configured to capture GPS coordinates of theareas of the field where the harvester collects mature crops from thefield. In yet other examples, various agricultural machines may beequipped with GPS-enabled sensors for detecting GPS coordinates relatedto treatment of crops within the field.

In another embodiment, the agricultural data records may be receivedfrom external data 110 which may store geo-location information forfields previously planted and harvested by one or more agriculturalmachines. For instance, a planter and/or harvester, equipped withGPS-enabled sensors, may be enabled to collect and transmit theagricultural data records of the planting and harvesting events to thedata server computer 108. The data server computer 108 may send externaldata 110, which may include the agricultural data records, to system130.

3.1.2. Processing Agricultural Data Records

At block 710, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172generates a plurality of planting datasets and a plurality of harvestingdatasets based on at least one of geo-location information or timestampsof each of the planting data values and each of the harvesting datavalues. In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may aggregate planting data values based uponassociated timestamp information to generate multiple planting datasetsand may aggregate harvesting data values based upon associated timestampinformation to generate multiple harvesting datasets. For example, if aplanting data value has a timestamp that is within one second of theprevious planting data value, then the agricultural data recordprocessing instructions 172 may determine the planting data value andthe previous planting data value belong to the same planting pass basedupon the temporal proximity of the timestamps. If however, thesubsequent planting data value has a timestamp that is 5 seconds afterthe previous timestamp, then the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may determine that the subsequent planting data valuebelongs to another pass. The 5 second gap between timestamps may beindicative of the planter turning on the field to perform another passacross the field.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example embodiment of processing agricultural datarecords and determining planting datasets and harvesting datasets usingagricultural equipment passes. Blocks 905-930 represent sub operationsperformed within block 710. At block 905, the agricultural data recordprocessing instructions 172 aggregates planting data values into setsbased on associated timestamps to generate planting datasets. Eachplanting dataset may represent planting data values belonging to asingle planting pass by a planter or other agricultural equipment. Eachset of planting data values represented by a planting dataset may bebased on subsequent timestamps that are within a temporal thresholdvalue. For example, if the planter deposits hybrid seeds during a singlepass at a rate of 1 unit of hybrid seeds per second, then a thresholdvalue greater than 1, such as 2 seconds, may be used to identify whenthe planter has stopped planting seeds during a pass. A large gapbetween subsequent timestamps may be indicative of the planter turningaround to start a new pass. When the planter begins to turn, planting isstopped in order to ensure even planting during passes. Therefore theagricultural data record processing instructions 172 may identify theend of a pass if the temporal gap between timestamps is greater than thetemporal threshold value. In an embodiment, the temporal threshold valuemay be configured based upon the type of agricultural equipment and thefrequency at which hybrid seeds are planted into the field.

At block 910, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172normalizes planting data values within the planting datasets to removedetectable GPS errors and to ensure that each of the planting datavalues within each planting dataset have the same heading direction.During treatment of a field, agricultural equipment performs a series ofpasses across the field. During each pass the agricultural equipmentheads in one direction along the field. As a result, planting datavalues associated with the pass should have the same heading direction.In an embodiment, each of the planting data values may include latitudeand longitude values that describe a geo-location. A heading directionmay be determined by analyzing consecutive planting data values anddetermining differences between the latitude and longitude of theconsecutive planting data values. For example, if a first planting datavalue has a latitude-longitude value of (100, 65) and a second plantingdata value has a latitude-longitude value of (100, 85), then theagricultural data record processing instructions 172 may determine thatthe heading associated with the first planting data value is along thelongitudinal axis in a positive direction based upon the change inlongitude from 65 to 85. The heading direction of the second plantingdata value may be determined based on the latitude-longitude value ofthe second planting data value and a third planting data value.

If however, differences between both the latitude and longitude valuesexist between consecutive planting data values, then the agriculturaldata record processing instructions 172 may determine, based on thedifferences, whether changes in either the latitude or longitude betweenconsecutive planting data values is a result of a GPS error or a resultof how the planting pass is oriented. For example, if the difference inlatitude for consecutive planting data values is from 100 to 102 and thedifference in longitude is from 65 to 85, then the agricultural datarecord processing instructions 172 may determine that the slightlatitude change of 100 to 102 is not the dominant direction of theagricultural equipment and that the latitude change may be a result of aGPS error or a result of how the planting pass is oriented with respectto latitude and longitude values. In an embodiment, if the agriculturaldata record processing instructions 172 determines that the detectedchanges in the latitude and/or longitude between consecutive plantingdata values are a result of GPS detection errors, then the agriculturaldata record processing instructions 172 may adjust the latitude and/orlongitude to correct the errors.

In an embodiment, if the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 determines that the detected changes in the latitudeand longitude between consecutive planting data values are a result ofthe orientation of the planting pass, then the agricultural data recordprocessing instructions 172 may adjust the latitude and longitude ofplanting data values to reflect changes in geo-location on a singleaxis. For example, if both the latitude and longitude changed betweenconsecutive planting data values, then the agricultural data recordprocessing instructions 172 may adjust both the latitude and longitudesuch that only one of the latitude and longitude values changes betweenconsecutive planting data records. Adjustments to the geo-locations maybe made such that the relative distance between consecutive plantingdata records is maintained. The resulting planting data values for aplanting dataset, which represents a planting pass, may show changes inGPS coordinate values along a single axis, such as either latitude orlongitude. By transforming the planting data values to reflect GPScoordinate value changes along a single axis, further computation may besimplified by only relying on changes on a single axis over two axes.

In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions172 may determine other GPS errors within planting data values basedupon variations between planting data values observed from parallel rowunits on a planter. As described, planters may be equipped with multiplerow unit configured to plant, in parallel, multiple hybrids seeds atonce. The distances between parallel planted hybrid seeds may becalculated based upon the distances between row units on the planter.The agricultural data record processing instructions 172 may determinewidths between adjacent row units based upon the type of planter and therow unit spacing on the planter. The known widths between adjacent rowunits may be used by the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 to determine whether shifting errors between detectedplanting data values exist by comparing the relative distance betweengeo-locations of planting data values of consecutive row units overmultiple seed planting events. For example, if the distance between rowunit 1 and row unit 2 on the planter is 1 foot and observed GPScoordinates between row unit 1 and row unit 2 indicate a 1 foot gapduring a first planting event and a 1.2 foot gap during a secondplanting event, then the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may determine a possible GPS error for the secondplanting event as the actual gap between row units is only 1 foot. In anembodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172 maydetect potential GPS errors between observed GPS coordinates of adjacentrow units and may adjust one or more GPS coordinates of planting datavalues in order to correct slight shifts caused by the GPS errors.

In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions172 may also associate distance values to each of the planting datavalues using known widths of the planter and its attached row units. Forexample, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172 maydetermine lengths between planting data values based upon the configuredwidths between row units. The determine lengths may also be applied toplanting data values from consecutive planting events. For example, if aspecific change in latitude and/or longitude is determined to translateto a distance of 1 foot, then the similar changes in latitude/longitudemay be used to calculate other distances between other planting datavalues.

In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions172 may normalize planting data values by shifting GPS coordinates,rotating the latitude and longitude of the GPS coordinates, and applyingmeasurable units to GPS coordinates to reduce observed GPS errors basedupon adjacent planting data values and associating heading directions toeach planting data value.

Normalized planting data values may be used to further refine sets ofplanting data values that make up the planting datasets generated atblock 905. In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may optionally proceed back to block 905 to validatethe generated planting datasets using heading directions associated withplanting data values. For example, the planting datasets initiallygenerated at block 905 were based upon timestamp values where a newplanting dataset was generated if the gap between consecutive plantingdata values was above a temporal threshold value, which indicated thatthe planter may be turning and therefore starting a new planting pass.However, large gaps between timestamp values may also be attributed toother conditions such as, sensor errors or stopping and starting theplanter within the field.

At block 905, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172may analyze heading directions associated with planting data values ofconsecutive planting datasets to determine whether the heading directionchanges for each consecutive planting dataset. Consecutive plantingdatasets should have associated heading directions that switch inorientation indicating that the planter turned around and started a newpass. If consecutive planting datasets have the same heading direction,then the consecutive planting datasets may belong to the same plantingpass and the gap between subsequent timestamps of planting data valuesmay have been the result of GPS detection errors or the planter stoppingmidway through a planting pass. In an embodiment, agricultural datarecord processing instructions 172 may merge consecutive plantingdatasets if the planting dataset have the same heading direction.

At block 915, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172may assign a unique planting pass identifier (ID) to each of theplanting datasets. Each planting dataset may represent planting datavalues from a particular planting pass of the planter. In an embodiment,the agricultural data record processing instructions 172 may assignunique planting pass IDs to each of the planting datasets.

At block 920, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172aggregates harvesting data values into sets based on timestamps togenerate harvesting datasets. In an embodiment, the agricultural datarecord processing instructions 172 may analyze timestamps of consecutiveharvesting data values to identify an end of a harvesting pass basedupon whether the temporal gap between timestamps is greater than thetemporal threshold value. The temporal threshold value may be configuredbased upon the type of agricultural equipment and the frequency at whichcrops are harvested from the field. Each harvesting dataset mayrepresent consecutive harvesting data values belonging to a singleharvesting pass by a harvester if the corresponding harvesting datavalues have consecutive timestamps that are below the temporal thresholdvalue.

At block 925, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172normalizes harvesting data values within the harvesting datasets toremove detectable GPS errors and to ensure that each of the harvestingdata values within each harvesting dataset have the same headingdirection. In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may apply the same transformations performed on theplanting data values of the planting datasets to the harvesting datavalues within the harvesting datasets. For example, if the GPScoordinates of planting data values were rotated to ensure that theplanting passes are along a single axis, then the agricultural datarecord processing instructions 172 may apply the same rotation to theharvesting data values in order to ensure consistency between theplanting datasets and the harvesting datasets. In an embodiment, theagricultural data record processing instructions 172 may adjust scalingto be applied to the harvesting datasets based upon the width of theharvester and the relative spacing between harvest units on theharvester.

In an embodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions172 may optionally proceed back to block 905 to validate the generatedharvesting datasets using heading directions associated with harvestingdata values. At block 905, the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 may analyze heading directions associated withharvesting data values of consecutive harvesting datasets to determinewhether the heading direction changes for each consecutive harvestingdataset. The agricultural data record processing instructions 172 maymerge consecutive harvesting datasets if the harvesting datasets havethe same heading direction.

At block 930, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172may assign a unique harvesting pass identifier (ID) to each of theharvesting datasets. Each harvesting dataset may represent harvestingdata values from a particular harvesting pass of the harvester. In anembodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172 mayassign unique harvesting pass IDs to each of the harvesting datasets.

3.1.3. Determine Matching Planting Pass and Harvesting Pass Pairs

Referring to FIG. 7, at block 715 the data point correlationinstructions 174 determines a dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairsthat represent matching pairs of planting and harvesting datasets basedupon proximities of geo-locations associated with each of the plantingand harvesting datasets. In an embodiment, the data point correlationinstructions 174 may, for each harvesting dataset, determine the closestplanting dataset based upon associated geo-location coordinates ofharvesting data values from the harvesting dataset and associatedgeo-location coordinates of planting data values from the plantingdatasets. For example, the data point correlation instructions 174 mayselect one harvest data value, multiple harvest data values, or everyharvest data value from the harvest dataset and compare the associatedgeo-locations to geo-locations of planting data values of the plantingdatasets to determine which planting dataset is closest to theharvesting dataset. Upon determining matches between the harvestingdatasets and the planting datasets, the data point correlationinstructions 174 may assign the planting pass IDs of the plantingdatasets to the corresponding harvesting datasets. In an embodiment, aplanting pass ID may be assigned to multiple harvesting datasets. Thismay occur if the width of the harvester is shorter than the width of theplanter, such that multiple harvest passes were needed to harvest thearea of a single planting pass.

3.1.4. Calculating GPS Error Values

At block 720, the geo-location error calculation instructions 176determines geo-location error values for each of theplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs. The geo-location error calculation instructions 176 may calculategeo-location offset values between geo-locations of planting datavalues, of a planting dataset, and geo-locations of harvesting datavalues, of a corresponding harvesting dataset, by calculating theperpendicular distance between the two geo-locations. In an embodiment,the geo-location error calculation instructions 176 may determinecentroid locations of the harvester for particular harvesting datavalues of a particular harvesting dataset by determining a centroid froma plurality of harvesting data values of the particular harvestingdataset that have the same timestamps.

FIG. 10 illustrates an example embodiment of determining perpendiculardistance values between centroid points of harvesting data values andplanting data values. Harvest line 1005 may represent the width of theharvester, including harvesting data values observed from sensors on theharvester. Harvest centroid 1010 may represent the centroid position ofthe harvester and may be calculated based upon the harvesting datavalues and the width of the harvest line 1005. Planting line 1015 mayrepresent the width of the planter, including planting data valuesobserved from sensors on the planter. Planting centroid 1020 mayrepresent the centroid position calculated based on the width of theplanter and the corresponding planting data values. The perpendiculardistance may be calculated as by projecting two unit vectors. Unitvector 1025 represents the distance from planting centroid 1020 to theharvest line in along the heading direction of the harvester. Unitvector 1030 represents the distance from harvest centroid 1010 to unitvector 1025 in a direction that is perpendicular to the headingdirection of the harvester. The sum of unit vector 1025 and unit vector1030 would equal the distance between planting centroid 1020 and harvestcentroid 1010.

In an embodiment, the geo-location error calculation instructions 176may calculate the length of coverage of the harvesting dataset withrespect to the planting dataset as:

${{Harvest}\mspace{14mu} {coverage}} = {1 - \left\lbrack {{{ABS}\left( {{perpendicular}\mspace{14mu} {{dist}.}} \right)} + \frac{h_{width}}{2} - \frac{p_{width}}{2}} \right\rbrack}$

where h_(width) is the width of the harvester and p_(width) is the widthof the planter.

The harvest coverage may represent the amount of the harvester thatcovers an area of the planter. The geo-location error calculationinstructions 176 may calculate harvest coverages for each harvestingdataset and for each harvest data value within each harvesting dataset.In other embodiments, the geo-location error calculation instructions176 may selectively choose a subset of harvesting datasets to determineharvest coverage. For example, every 10^(th) harvesting data value froma harvesting dataset may be used to determine harvest coverage using thecorresponding planting data value.

In another embodiment, the geo-location error calculation instructions176 may calculate harvest coverage as a percentage of the harvester thatoverlaps with planter passes. The percentage of coverage may becalculated as:

${{Harvest}\mspace{14mu} {coverage}} = {1 - {{CLIP}\left\lbrack {{\left( {{{ABS}\left( {{perpendicular}\mspace{14mu} {{dist}.}} \right)} + \frac{h_{width}}{2} - \frac{p_{width}}{2}} \right)\text{/}h_{width}},0,1} \right\rbrack}}$

where h_(width) is the width of the harvester and p_(width) is the widthof the planter. The CLIP function serves to ensure that the harvestcoverage value is represented as a value between 0 and 1.

3.1.5. Presenting GPS Error Values

At block 725, system 130 may present geo-location error values to aclient device display screen. In an embodiment, system 130 may outputthe geo-location error values in various forms to a user associated withthe client device, such as the field manager computer device 104. Forexample, the geo-location error values, measured by harvest coverage ofthe planter passes may be outputted as data quality metrics in a datafile for the field. The data quality metric may comprise a text label,metadata value, or numeric value that signals a data quality issue inthe data file. In another embodiment, system 130 may transmit areal-time notification, in response to detecting GPS errors, to a useraccount that is associated with a data file. The user account could befor a grower 102, a data custodian or a data analyst.

FIG. 12 illustrates embodiments of graphical interfaces presented on aclient computer that graphically display the geo-location error valueswithin a field. Graph 1205 displays the percentage of harvest coveragethat is less than 60% of a planter pass on the field. Dots 1210represent overlaps of planting datasets and harvesting datasets thathave coverage greater than or equal to 60%. Marks 1215 representoverlaps of planting datasets and harvesting datasets that have coverageless than 60%. Graph 1205 may be used by a grower 102 to efficientlyrecognize areas within the field where GPS errors between the planterand the harvester may be causing inaccurate harvesting of the hybridcrop.

Graph 1220 displays the percentage of harvest coverage that is less than90% of a planter pass on the field. Dots 1225 represent overlaps ofplanting datasets and harvesting datasets that have coverage greaterthan or equal to 90%. Marks 1230 represent overlaps of planting datasetsand harvesting datasets that have coverage less than 90%. Graphs 1205and 1220 are sample representations of how GPS error values betweenplanting and harvesting events may be presented to a grower 102. Grower102 may configure system 130 to present various graphs with differentcoverage thresholds to the grower 102, including graphs that present thethresholds in terms of units, such as inches or feet. For example, thepresented graph may display harvest coverage where the amount ofharvester overlap is greater than or equal to 2 feet.

3.2. GPS Error Detection—Iterative Approach

In an embodiment, one method for determining GPS errors between observeddata points of planting data and harvesting data may include an approachof iterating through harvesting data values and determining a nearestcorresponding planting data values based upon geo-location proximity.Once matching pairs of planting data values and harvesting data valuesare determined, geo-location distances between matching pairs may becalculated to determine whether GPS error exist between the plantingdata values and the corresponding harvesting data values.

3.2.1. Receiving Agricultural Data Records

Referring to FIG. 7, at block 705, computer system 130 is programmed toreceive agricultural data records for one or more fields. Theagricultural data records received by system 130 may include multiplelayers of observed treatment data, such as a planting layer representedby planting data values and a harvesting layer represented by harvestingdata values. Each of the planting and harvesting data values may includegeo-location information, such as GPS coordinates, and timestampinformation. GPS coordinates may represent a small area of the fieldwhere the planting event or harvesting event occurs. In an embodiment,the agricultural data records may be received from field data 106collected from agricultural machines or from external data 110 sent fromdata server computer 108.

3.2.2. Processing Agricultural Data Records

At block 710, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172generates a plurality of planting datasets and a plurality of harvestingdatasets based upon geo-location information and timestamps of each ofthe planting data values and each of the harvesting data values. In anembodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172 mayaggregate planting data values that have the same associated timestampinformation and geo-location information indicating that the plantingdata values are close in proximity. The generated planting datasets mayeach represent a hybrid seed planting event by the planter at a specifictime. A hybrid seed planting event represents a moment when each of themultiple row units of the planter deposit hybrid seeds into the ground.For example, if the planter has 5 row units that each deposit one hybridseed at a rate of one seed per second, then at each time interval theplanter sensors may generate 5 planting data values, one for each hybridseed planted by the 5 row units. Referring to FIG. 10, planting line1015 represents the width of the planter and each of the dots along theplanting line 1015 each represent planting data values from a plantingevent.

FIG. 11A illustrates an example embodiment of processing agriculturaldata records and determining planting datasets and harvesting datasetsbased upon widths of agricultural equipment. Blocks 1105-1120 representsub operations performed within block 710. At block 1105, agriculturaldata record processing instructions 172 aggregates planting data valuesthat have geo-locations indicating that the planting data values arefrom the same planting event and have similar associated timestamps. Forexample, planting data values for observations of hybrid seeds plantedat the same time by row units on the same planter are aggregated togenerate a planting dataset. The result of the aggregation of plantingdata values is a plurality of planting datasets for each planting eventperformed on the field by the planter. Each planting dataset mayrepresent an area made up of the union of geo-locations of the plantingdata values.

At block 1110, agricultural data record processing instructions 172determines a centroid location for each planting dataset. In anembodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172determines the width of the planter based upon the planter type andmodel. In another embodiment, the agricultural data record processinginstructions 172 determines the width of the planter based upon plantingdata values of the planting dataset that are the furthest from thecentroid location and are perpendicular to the heading direction. Theagricultural data record processing instructions 172 determines thecentroid location based upon each of the planting data values and theoverall width of the planter. Referring to FIG. 10, planting centroid1020 represents the centroid location of the planting line 1015 of theplanter.

At block 1115, agricultural data record processing instructions 172aggregates harvesting data values that have geo-locations indicated thatthe harvesting data values are from the same harvesting event and havesimilar associated timestamps. For example, harvesting data values forobservations of crops harvested at the same time by the same harvesterare aggregated to generate a harvesting dataset. The result ofaggregating harvesting data values is a plurality of harvesting datasetsfor each harvesting event performed on the field by a harvester.

At block 1120, agricultural data record processing instructions 172determines a centroid location for each harvesting dataset. In anembodiment, the agricultural data record processing instructions 172determines the width of the harvester based upon the harvester type andmodel. The agricultural data record processing instructions 172determines the centroid location based upon each of the harvesting datavalues in the harvesting dataset. In another embodiment, theagricultural data record processing instructions 172 determines thewidth of the harvester based upon harvesting data values of theharvesting dataset that are the furthest from the centroid location andare perpendicular to the heading direction.

In an embodiment, aggregating planting data values and determining thecentroid location for planting datasets (blocks 1105 and 1110) andaggregating harvesting data values and determining the centroid locationfor harvesting datasets (blocks 1115 and 1120) may be performed inparallel or sequentially in either order. For example, the agriculturaldata record processing instructions 172 may perform blocks 1115 and 1120then perform blocks 1105 and 1110 or may perform blocks 1105 and 1110 inparallel with blocks 1115 and 1120.

3.2.3. Determine Matches Planting Datasets

Referring to FIG. 7, at block 715 the data point correlationinstructions 174 determines a dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairsthat represent matching pairs of planting and harvesting datasets basedupon proximities of geo-locations associated with each of the plantingand harvesting datasets. FIG. 11B illustrates an example embodiment ofdetermining matching pairs of planting datasets and harvesting datasets.Sub-operations of block 715 are illustrated by blocks 1125-1145 of FIG.11B.

At block 1125, the data point correlation instructions 174 maps theplanting datasets within a multi-dimensional space using geo-locationsof the centroids associated with each planting dataset. In anembodiment, the data point correlation instructions 174 may spatiallyindex each centroid of the planting datasets within a multi-dimensionalspace. For example, the data point correlation instructions 174 mayimplement a k-dimensional tree and organize geo-locations of centroidsby mapping each of the centroids within the k-dimensional tree. Thek-dimensional tree may then be used to determine which centroid of theplanting datasets is closest in proximity to a centroid location of aharvesting dataset.

In an embodiment, the data point correlation instructions 174 mayiterate through each of the harvesting datasets to determine whichplanting dataset is closest in proximity to a particular harvestingdataset. At decision diamond 1130, the data point correlationinstructions 174 may determine whether there are remaining harvestingdatasets to map to corresponding planting datasets. If there areremaining harvesting datasets to map, then the data point correlationinstructions 174 may select a harvesting dataset from the remaining setof harvesting datasets and proceed to block 1135. If however, there areno more remaining harvesting datasets to map to a corresponding plantingdataset, then the data point correlation instructions 174 may proceed toblock 720 of FIG. 7, to determine geo-location offsets between plantingdatasets and harvesting datasets.

At block 1135, the data point correlation instructions 174 determinesthe planting dataset that is nearest to the selected harvesting dataset.In an embodiment, the data point correlation instructions 174 may usethe generated k-dimensional tree to determine which centroid location ofa planting dataset is nearest to the centroid location of the selectedharvesting dataset. The data point correlation instructions 174 maycalculate a distance value between the centroid location of a plantingdataset and the centroid location of the selected harvesting datasetusing the geo-location coordinates of each centroid location.

At decision diamond 1140, the data point correlation instructions 174determines whether the distance value between the centroid locations ofthe planting dataset and the selected harvesting dataset are within atolerance threshold. In an embodiment, the tolerance threshold mayrepresent a maximum distance between centroid locations to be considereda matching pair. For example, if the distance value is greater than asum of the width of the planter and the width of the harvester, then thedata point correlation instructions 174 may determine that the plantingpass of the planter and the harvest pass of the harvester to do notoverlap at all. In this case, the data point correlation instructions174 may conclude that the planting dataset and the selected harvestingdataset should not be considered matching pairs. The data pointcorrelation instructions 174 may then associate an “NA” value to theselected harvesting dataset as no corresponding planting dataset wasfound and may proceed back to decision diamond 1130 to evaluate anotherharvesting dataset. If however, the distance value is within thetolerance threshold, then the data point correlation instructions 174may proceed to block 1145.

In another embodiment, the tolerance threshold may represent a maximumtolerance between heading directions for the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset. For example, if the heading directions between theplanting dataset and the harvesting dataset differ to a great enoughdegree, then the data point correlation instructions 174 may concludethat the planting dataset and the selected harvesting dataset do notmatch. In an embodiment, the data point correlation instructions 174 maydetermine if the heading directions of the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset differ too greatly, as:

ABS(SIN(harvest_(heading) MOD 180)−(planting heading MOD 180))>0.1

where harvest_(heading) is the heading direction associated with theharvesting dataset and planting_(heading) is the heading directionassociated with the planting dataset. The “0.1” value represents thetolerance threshold value.

In an embodiment, if the difference in heading directions is above thetolerance threshold then the data point correlation instructions 174 maydetermine that the selected harvesting dataset and the planting datasetdo not match. If there is no match, then the data point correlationinstructions 174 may proceed back to decision diamond 1130 to determinewhether there are remaining harvesting datasets to analyze. If thedifference in heading directions is within the tolerance threshold thenthe data point correlation instructions 174 may proceed to block 1145.

At block 1145, the data point correlation instructions 174 generates aplanting-to-harvesting pair for the matching planting dataset and theselected harvesting dataset. Generated planting-to-harvesting pairs maybe stored within a dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs for lateruse.

3.2.4. Calculating GPS Error Values

Referring back to FIG. 7, at block 720 the geo-location errorcalculation instructions 176 determines geo-location error valuesbetween each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs. The geo-location error calculationinstructions 176 may calculate geo-location offset values betweengeo-locations of planting data values of a planting dataset andgeo-locations of harvesting data values of a harvesting dataset bycalculating the perpendicular distance between the two geo-locations.

In an embodiment, the geo-location error calculation instructions 176may calculate harvest coverage as a percentage of the harvester thatoverlaps with planter passes. The percentage of coverage may becalculated as:

${{Harvest}\mspace{14mu} {coverage}} = {1 - {{CLIP}\left\lbrack {{\left( {{{ABS}\left( {{perpendicular}\mspace{14mu} {{dist}.}} \right)} + \frac{h_{width}}{2} - \frac{p_{width}}{2}} \right)\text{/}h_{width}},0,1} \right\rbrack}}$

where h_(width) is the width of the harvester and p_(width) is the widthof the planter. The CLIP function serves to ensure that the harvestcoverage value is represented as a value between 0 and 1.

The geo-location error calculation instructions 176 may calculateharvest coverages for each harvesting dataset using the centroidlocations of each harvesting dataset. In other embodiments, thegeo-location error calculation instructions 176 may selectively choose asubset of harvesting datasets to determine harvest coverage. Forexample, every 10^(th) harvesting data value from a harvesting datasetmay be used to determine harvest coverage using the correspondingplanting data value.

In an embodiment, the geo-location error calculation instructions 176may compute a proportion harvest coverage records that are less that aconfigured value x for x starting from “0” to “1” in increments of 0.01.

3.2.5 Presenting GPS Error Values

At block 725, system 130 may present geo-location error values to aclient device display screen. In an embodiment, system 130 may outputthe geo-location error values in various forms to a user associated withthe client device. For example, the geo-location error values, measuredby harvest coverage of the planter passes may be outputted as dataquality metrics in a data file for the field. The data quality metricmay comprise a text label, metadata value, or numeric value that signalsa data quality issue in the data file. In another embodiment, system 130may transmit a real-time notification, in response to detecting GPSerrors, to a user account that is associated with a data file. The useraccount could be for a grower 102, a data custodian or a data analyst.

An example of presenting a graphical display of harvest coverage isgraph 1205. Graph 1205 displays the percentage of harvest coverage thatis less than 60% of a planter pass on the field. Dots 1210 representoverlaps of planting datasets and harvesting datasets that have coveragegreater than or equal to 60%. Marks 1215 represent overlaps of plantingdatasets and harvesting datasets that have coverage less than 60%. Graph1205 may be used by a grower 102 to efficiently recognize areas withinthe field where GPS errors between the planter and the harvester may becausing inaccurate harvesting of the hybrid crop.

Graph 1220 displays the percentage of harvest coverage that is less than90% of a planter pass on the field. Dots 1225 represent overlaps ofplanting datasets and harvesting datasets that have coverage greaterthan or equal to 90%. Marks 1230 represent overlaps of planting datasetsand harvesting datasets that have coverage less than 90%. Graphs 1205and 1220 are sample representations of how GPS error values betweenplanting and harvesting events may be presented to a grower 102. Grower102 may configure system 130 to present various graphs with differentcoverage thresholds to the grower 102, including graphs that present thethresholds in terms of units, such as inches or feet. For example, thepresented graph may display harvest coverage where the amount ofharvester overlap is greater than or equal to 2 feet.

It will be apparent from the disclosure as a whole that embodiments aredirected to practical applications of computing technology, such aserror correction of digitally stored location data of agriculturalequipment treatment paths. For example, embodiments are directed tocorrelating multiple agricultural equipment treatment paths in order toensure accurate planting, treatment, and harvesting of hybrid seeds andcrops. Embodiments describe identifying errors in location data causedby either geo-location observation errors and/or equipment path errorscaused by agricultural equipment traveling along an inaccurate treatmentpath. System 130 may identify and correlate multiple different treatmentpaths of agricultural equipment and correct for errors in location data.Corrected location data may then be used to correlated crop observationsto prior treatments of crop. More accurate treatment observations(corrected observations) may lead to more efficient tracking of cropgrowth and crop yields for multiple hybrid seeds planted within fields.

In an embodiment, corrected location data may be used to program futuretreatments of crop on fields by agricultural equipment. For example,location data identified and corrected from planters and other treatmentequipment may be used to program harvest paths of harvesters in order toensure accurate harvesting of hybrid crop planted. In anotherembodiment, corrected location data may be used to reduce the number ofplanting, treatment, and harvest passes performed by agriculturalequipment. For example, corrected location data may be used to map wherehybrid seeds have been planted and, for example harvesters, may beprogrammed such that the number of harvest passes performed within thefield may be reduced by maximizing their coverage for harvesting plantedcrop based on the corrected location data.

In another embodiment, corrected location data may be used in real-timeto adjust treatment paths of agricultural equipment during treatment, inorder to ensure accurate treatment of planted crop. For example, harvestpaths of harvesters may be adjusted if a current path of the harvesteris not tracking corrected location data from a planter or otheragricultural equipment. The harvester may be programmed to automaticallyshift or rotate the harvester's current path in order to more accuratelytrack a path that covers the planted crop.

In yet another embodiment, correlating location data from multipledifferent treatments may be parallelized using multiple differentprocessors, such that each process correlates planting and harvestingpasses in parallel; thus reducing processing time to correlate themultiple planting and harvesting passes.

4. Extensions and Alternatives

In the foregoing specification, embodiments of the invention have beendescribed with reference to numerous specific details that may vary fromimplementation to implementation. The specification and drawings are,accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictivesense. The sole and exclusive indicator of the scope of the invention,and what is intended by the applicants to be the scope of the invention,is the literal and equivalent scope of the set of claims that issue fromthis application, in the specific form in which such claims issue,including any subsequent correction.

What is claimed is:
 1. A computer-implemented method comprising:receiving, over a digital data communication network at a servercomputer, agricultural data records comprising a plurality of plantingdata values and a plurality of harvesting data values, wherein theplurality of planting data values comprises planting geo-locationcoordinates and corresponding timestamps and the plurality of harvestingdata values comprises harvesting geo-location coordinates and acorresponding timestamps; generating, by the server computer, aplurality of planting datasets by aggregating planting data values, ofthe plurality of planting data values, based on at least one of plantinggeo-location coordinates and timestamps, and generating a plurality ofharvesting datasets by aggregating harvesting data values, of theplurality of harvesting data values, based on at least one of harvestinggeo-location coordinates and timestamps; determining, by the servercomputer, a dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs that representmatching pairs of planting datasets to corresponding harvesting datasetsbased upon proximities between geo-location coordinates of plantingdatasets and geo-location coordinates of harvesting datasets;determining, by the server computer, geo-location error values for eachof the dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs by determininggeo-location offset values between geo-locations of each plantingdataset and each corresponding particular harvesting dataset;presenting, by the server computer, the geo-location error values on adisplay screen of a client computer.
 2. The computer-implemented methodof claim 1, further comprising: determining an overall field qualityvalue for the field by computing a sum of the geo-location error valuesand dividing the sum by a field specific error threshold value; andpresenting the overall field quality value on a display screen of aclient computer.
 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, furthercomprising: generating a graphical representation of a field with thegeo-location error values, the graphical representation comprising: oneor more first indicators representing planting and harvesting datasetsthat do not have a geo-location error value above a specified threshold;one or more second indicators representing planting and harvestingdatasets that have a geo-location error value above the specifiedthreshold; and wherein the one or more first indicators and the one ormore second indicators are displayed using one of a color-coded symbolor a numerical value.
 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1,wherein generating planting datasets and harvesting datasets from theplanting data values and harvesting data values, comprises: aggregatingsets of planting data values based on corresponding timestamps togenerate the planting datasets, wherein timestamps of consecutiveplanting data values of the sets of planting data values are within afirst temporal threshold value; normalizing the sets of planting datavalues of the planting datasets by applying at least one of a headingdirection rotation adjustment, a geo-location shift adjustment, andapplying measurable unit values; assigning unique planting passidentifiers to each of the planting datasets; aggregating sets ofharvesting data values based on corresponding timestamps to generate theharvesting datasets, wherein timestamps of consecutive harvesting datavalues of the sets of harvesting data values are within a secondtemporal threshold value; normalizing the sets of harvesting data valuesof the harvesting datasets by applying at least one of a headingdirection rotation adjustment, a geo-location shift adjustment, andapplying measurable unit values; and assigning unique harvesting passidentifiers to each of the harvesting datasets.
 5. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 4, wherein determining the datasetof matching pairs between the planting datasets and the harvestingdatasets, comprises: for each harvesting dataset of the harvestingdatasets: determining a nearest planting dataset to the harvestingdataset based upon associated geo-locations of corresponding plantingdata values in the nearest planting dataset and associated geo-locationsof corresponding harvesting data values in the harvesting dataset;generating a planting-to-harvesting pair by assigning the planting passidentifier of the nearest planting dataset to the harvesting dataset;aggregating the planting-to-harvesting pairs to generate the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs.
 6. The computer-implemented method ofclaim 4, wherein determining the geo-location error values for eachplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, comprises, for each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs of thedataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs: determining a first distancebetween a planting dataset and a harvesting dataset as a first unitvector that is parallel to the direction of the harvesting datasets;determining a second distance between the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset as a second unit vector that is perpendicular to thedirection of the harvesting datasets; calculating a perpendiculardistance as a sum of the first unit vector and the second unit vector;and determining the geo-location error value as a length of overlap ofthe harvesting dataset with the planting dataset as one minus a sum ofthe perpendicular distance and a width of the harvesting dataset dividedby two, minus a width of the planting dataset divided by two.
 7. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein generating plantingdatasets and harvesting datasets from the planting data values andharvesting data values, comprises: aggregating planting data values thathave geo-location coordinates that are within a first proximity to eachother and have same timestamp values to generate the planting datasets,wherein the first proximity is based upon a width of a planter;determining centroid locations for each planting dataset of the plantingdatasets by determining a planting centroid geo-location forcorresponding planting data values that make up each of the plantingdatasets; aggregating harvesting data values that have geo-locationcoordinates that are within a second proximity to each other and havesame timestamp values, wherein the second proximity is based upon awidth of a harvester; and determining centroid locations for eachharvesting dataset of the harvesting datasets by determining aharvesting centroid geo-location for corresponding harvesting datavalues that make up each of the harvesting datasets.
 8. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 7, wherein determining the datasetof matching pairs between the planting datasets and the harvestingdatasets, comprises: mapping each of the planting datasets within amulti-dimensional space based upon the centroid locations associatedwith each of the planting datasets; for each harvesting dataset of theharvesting datasets: determining a distance value between nearestcentroid locations of a planting dataset of the planting datasets andthe corresponding harvesting dataset; determining whether the distancevalue is below a tolerance threshold; upon determining that the distancevalue is below the tolerance threshold, generating aplanting-to-harvesting pair between the nearest planting dataset and thecorresponding harvesting dataset; and aggregating theplanting-to-harvesting pairs to generate the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs.
 9. The computer-implemented method ofclaim 7, wherein determining the geo-location error values for eachplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, comprises, for each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs of thedataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs: determining a first distancebetween a planting dataset and a harvesting dataset as a first unitvector that is parallel to a direction of the harvesting datasets;determining a second distance between the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset as a second unit vector that is perpendicular to thedirection of the harvesting datasets; calculating a perpendiculardistance as a sum of the first unit vector and the second unit vector;and determining the geo-location error value as a percentage of overlapof the harvesting dataset with the planting dataset as one minus a sumof the perpendicular distance and a width of the harvesting datasetdivided by two, minus a width of the planting dataset divided by two,divided by the width of the harvesting dataset.
 10. Thecomputer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein determining thegeo-location error values for each of the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs comprises for every nthplanting-to-harvesting pair of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, determining geo-location offset values between geo-locations of aplanting dataset and a corresponding particular harvesting dataset. 11.A system comprising: one or more processors; a memory storinginstructions which, when executed by the one or more processors, causeperformance of: receiving agricultural data records comprising aplurality of planting data values and a plurality of harvesting datavalues, wherein the plurality of planting data values comprises plantinggeo-location coordinates and corresponding timestamps and the pluralityof harvesting data values comprises harvesting geo-location coordinatesand a corresponding timestamps; generating a plurality of plantingdatasets by aggregating planting data values, of the plurality ofplanting data values, based on at least one of planting geo-locationcoordinates and timestamps, and generating a plurality of harvestingdatasets by aggregating harvesting data values, of the plurality ofharvesting data values, based on at least one of harvesting geo-locationcoordinates and timestamps; determining a dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs that represent matching pairs of plantingdatasets to corresponding harvesting datasets based upon proximitiesbetween geo-location coordinates of planting datasets and geo-locationcoordinates of harvesting datasets; determining geo-location errorvalues for each of the dataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs bydetermining geo-location offset values between geo-locations of eachplanting dataset and each corresponding particular harvesting dataset;presenting the geo-location error values on a display screen of a clientcomputer.
 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the instructions, whenexecuted by the one or more processors, further cause performance of:determining an overall field quality value for the field by computing asum of the geo-location error values and dividing the sum by a fieldspecific error threshold value; and presenting the overall field qualityvalue on a display screen of a client computer.
 13. The system of claim11, wherein the instructions, when executed by the one or moreprocessors, further cause performance of: generating a graphicalrepresentation of a field with the geo-location error values, thegraphical representation comprising: one or more first indicatorsrepresenting planting and harvesting datasets that do not have ageo-location error value above a specified threshold; one or more secondindicators representing planting and harvesting datasets that have ageo-location error value above the specified threshold; and wherein theone or more first indicators and the one or more second indicators aredisplayed using one of a color-coded symbol or a numerical value. 14.The system of claim 11, wherein generating planting datasets andharvesting datasets from the planting data values and harvesting datavalues, comprises: aggregating sets of planting data values based oncorresponding timestamps to generate the planting datasets, whereintimestamps of consecutive planting data values of the sets of plantingdata values are within a first temporal threshold value; normalizing thesets of planting data values of the planting datasets by applying atleast one of a heading direction rotation adjustment, a geo-locationshift adjustment, and applying measurable unit values; assigning uniqueplanting pass identifiers to each of the planting datasets; aggregatingsets of harvesting data values based on corresponding timestamps togenerate the harvesting datasets, wherein timestamps of consecutiveharvesting data values of the sets of harvesting data values are withina second temporal threshold value; normalizing the sets of harvestingdata values of the harvesting datasets by applying at least one of aheading direction rotation adjustment, a geo-location shift adjustment,and applying measurable unit values; and assigning unique harvestingpass identifiers to each of the harvesting datasets.
 15. The system ofclaim 14, wherein determining the dataset of matching pairs between theplanting datasets and the harvesting datasets, comprises: for eachharvesting dataset of the harvesting datasets: determining a nearestplanting dataset to the harvesting dataset based upon associatedgeo-locations of corresponding planting data values in the nearestplanting dataset and associated geo-locations of correspondingharvesting data values in the harvesting dataset; generating aplanting-to-harvesting pair by assigning the planting pass identifier ofthe nearest planting dataset to the harvesting dataset; aggregating theplanting-to-harvesting pairs to generate the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs.
 16. The system of claim 14, whereindetermining the geo-location error values for eachplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, comprises, for each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs of thedataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs: determining a first distancebetween a planting dataset and a harvesting dataset as a first unitvector that is parallel to the direction of the harvesting datasets;determining a second distance between the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset as a second unit vector that is perpendicular to thedirection of the harvesting datasets; calculating a perpendiculardistance as a sum of the first unit vector and the second unit vector;and determining the geo-location error value as a length of overlap ofthe harvesting dataset with the planting dataset as one minus a sum ofthe perpendicular distance and a width of the harvesting dataset dividedby two, minus a width of the planting dataset divided by two.
 17. Thesystem of claim 11, wherein generating planting datasets and harvestingdatasets from the planting data values and harvesting data values,comprises: aggregating planting data values that have geo-locationcoordinates that are within a first proximity to each other and havesame timestamp values to generate the planting datasets, wherein thefirst proximity is based upon a width of a planter; determining centroidlocations for each planting dataset of the planting datasets bydetermining a planting centroid geo-location for corresponding plantingdata values that make up each of the planting datasets; aggregatingharvesting data values that have geo-location coordinates that arewithin a second proximity to each other and have same timestamp values,wherein the second proximity is based upon a width of a harvester; anddetermining centroid locations for each harvesting dataset of theharvesting datasets by determining a harvesting centroid geo-locationfor corresponding harvesting data values that make up each of theharvesting datasets.
 18. The system of claim 17, wherein determining thedataset of matching pairs between the planting datasets and theharvesting datasets, comprises: mapping each of the planting datasetswithin a multi-dimensional space based upon the centroid locationsassociated with each of the planting datasets; for each harvestingdataset of the harvesting datasets: determining a distance value betweennearest centroid locations of a planting dataset of the plantingdatasets and the corresponding harvesting dataset; determining whetherthe distance value is below a tolerance threshold; upon determining thatthe distance value is below the tolerance threshold, generating aplanting-to-harvesting pair between the nearest planting dataset and thecorresponding harvesting dataset; and aggregating theplanting-to-harvesting pairs to generate the dataset ofplanting-to-harvesting pairs.
 19. The system of claim 17, whereindetermining the geo-location error values for eachplanting-to-harvesting pairs of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, comprises, for each of the planting-to-harvesting pairs of thedataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs: determining a first distancebetween a planting dataset and a harvesting dataset as a first unitvector that is parallel to a direction of the harvesting datasets;determining a second distance between the planting dataset and theharvesting dataset as a second unit vector that is perpendicular to thedirection of the harvesting datasets; calculating a perpendiculardistance as a sum of the first unit vector and the second unit vector;and determining the geo-location error value as a percentage of overlapof the harvesting dataset with the planting dataset as one minus a sumof the perpendicular distance and a width of the harvesting datasetdivided by two, minus a width of the planting dataset divided by two,divided by the width of the harvesting dataset.
 20. The system of claim11, wherein determining the geo-location error values for each of thedataset of planting-to-harvesting pairs comprises for every nthplanting-to-harvesting pair of the dataset of planting-to-harvestingpairs, determining geo-location offset values between geo-locations of aplanting dataset and a corresponding particular harvesting dataset.